ArticleZhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi2016
[The role of different KIR haplotypes in haplo-identical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation].
Article in Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- [How I choose the best donor in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation settings].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the role of different immunoglobulin- like receptor (KIR)haplotypes in haplo- identical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT).
methodKiller cell KIR genotyping was performed on 468 individuals from 156 unrelated families by PCR-SSP. A total of 624 KIR haplotypes from the parents were used for haplotype analysis. Ninety-two patients received haplo-identical HSCT from one of the parents.
resultsThe family study showed segregation of one A haplotype and at least 20 unique B haplotypes. The frequency of haplotype A was 72.92% (455/624). The most commonly observed haplotypes in group B were B1, B2, and B3, present at a frequency of 10.26%, 5.77%, and 4.48%, respectively. Compared to KIR gene matched donors (n=17), grafts from KIR gene mismatched donors (n= 14) had a positive effect on survival after haplo- identical HSCT for AML/MDS patients (OS: 88.2%vs 42.9%,P=0.015; RFS: 88.2%vs 35.7%,P=0.007). No effect was observed for ALL/NHL patients (OS: 76.0%vs 75.0%,P=0.727; RFS: 68.0%vs 65.0%,P=0.866). A significantly lower survival rate was observed for transplants from AA (n=52) and AB1/AB2 donors (n=15), compared to other group Bx donors (n=25) (OS: 53.3%vs 96.0%,P=0.017; RFS: 53.3%vs 92.0%,P=0.019). Meanwhile, the risk of relapse was much higher in AA group (n=52) compared to Bx group (n=40) (25.0%vs 5.0%,P=0.009). A higher risk of TRM was observed in AB1/AB2 group (P=0.012). In addition, transplant from donors carried Cen-B was associated with an increased survival compared with Cen-A homozygous donors (OS: 94.7%vs 68.5%,P=0.036; RFS: 89.5%vs 64.4%,P=0.045).
conclusionOverall, KIR genotyping and haplotype analyses should be useful for selection of the most optimal donors with favorable KIR gene grafts. KIR gene mismatch donors should be preferred for AML/MDS patients. Selecting donors carried Cen- B and avoiding the selection of donors of KIR genotype AA/AB1/AB2 was strongly advisable for haplo-identical HSCT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.