Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26875154›Full record

ArticleCancer chemotherapy and pharmacology2016

Adaptive dosing of anticancer drugs in neonates: facilitating evidence-based dosing regimens.

Gareth J Veal, Julie Errington, Jairam Sastry, Julia Chisholm, Penelope Brock, Daniel Morgenstern, Kathy Pritchard-Jones, Tanzina Chowdhury

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Gareth J VealNorthern Institute for Cancer Research, Paul O'Gorman Building, Medical School, Framlington Place, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK. G.J.Veal@ncl.ac.uk.
Julie ErringtonNorthern Institute for Cancer Research, Paul O'Gorman Building, Medical School, Framlington Place, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK.
Jairam SastrySchool of Medicine, Glasgow University, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, UK.
Julia ChisholmGreat Ormond Street Hospital, London, WC1N 3JH, UK.
Penelope BrockGreat Ormond Street Hospital, London, WC1N 3JH, UK.
Daniel MorgensternGreat Ormond Street Hospital, London, WC1N 3JH, UK.
Kathy Pritchard-JonesInstitute of Child Health, University College London, London, WC1N 1EH, UK.
Tanzina ChowdhuryGreat Ormond Street Hospital, London, WC1N 3JH, UK.
University College London · GBGreat Ormond Street Hospital · GBNewcastle University · GBUniversity of Glasgow · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSelection of the most appropriate chemotherapy dosing regimens for neonates treated within the first weeks of life represents a significant clinical dilemma. Due to a lack of information relating to the clinical pharmacology of anticancer drugs in these challenging patients, current dosing guidelines are based on limited scientific rationale. In the current study, we investigate the utilisation of therapeutic drug monitoring approaches in neonates with localised hepatoblastoma, Wilms' tumour and stage 4S neuroblastoma, being treated with widely used anticancer drugs.

methodsPlasma concentrations of cisplatin, vincristine, etoposide and carboplatin were quantified in two neonates being treated within the first 3 weeks of life and in a 32-week preterm infant treated at a gestational age of 40 weeks. Therapeutic drug monitoring was carried out where appropriate, based on the pharmacokinetic data obtained in conjunction with clinical response and toxicity.

resultsTreatment of a child aged 2 weeks with a recommended cisplatin dose reduction for weight to 1.8 mg/kg resulted in achievement of unbound cisplatin plasma concentrations of 0.01-0.08 µg/mL, markedly lower than exposures previously reported in infants and older children. A dose increase to 2.7 mg/kg was implemented, leading to the achievement of levels more in-line with those previously reported. This increased dose level was well tolerated over six courses of treatment, resulting in a good response to cisplatin monotherapy and the patient remains in remission at 3.5 years. In contrast, a 50 % vincristine dose reduction for weight in a 3-week-old neonate resulted in plasma concentrations comparable to levels observed in older children, leading to successful treatment and continued remission at 2 years. In a third patient, etoposide and carboplatin clearance values normalised to body weight were comparable to those reported in older children, resulting in comparatively lower exposures following reduced dosing.

conclusionsThe current report provides unique data on the pharmacokinetics of several widely used anticancer drugs in neonates treated within the first few weeks of life. The provision of these data acts as a useful reference point to support future dosing decisions to be made by clinicians in the treatment of these challenging patients.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsArea Under CurveDrug MonitoringEvidence-Based PracticeHumansInfant, NewbornAntineoplastic AgentsCarboplatinChemotherapyCisplatinEtoposideHepatoblastomaNeonatesNeuroblastomaTherapeutic drug monitoringVincristineWilms’ tumour

Identifiers

PMID26875154
PMCPMC4819938
OpenAlexW2272149351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.