ArticleEuropean archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience2016
EPA guidance on improving the image of psychiatry.
Article in European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- EPA guidance on cultural competence training: a critical update and meta-review.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2026Pooled it
- Medical students and interns' attitude towards psychiatry as a postgraduate program in Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional study.Medicine · 2025Article
- Nursing students' metaphors of first clinical experiences of encountering patients with mental disorders.BMC nursing · 2024Article
- Psychiatrists' occupational stigma conceptualization, measurement, and intervention: A literature review.World journal of psychiatry · 2023Review
- Factors associated with interest in psychiatry in UK medical students: qualitative study.BJPsych bulletin · 2023Article
- Schizophrenia in Print, Digital, and Audiovisual Media: Trends, Topics, and Results From an Anti-Stigma Intervention Targeting Media Professionals.Schizophrenia bulletin open · 2023Article
- Stigma towards mental illness and help-seeking behaviors among adult and child psychiatrists in Hungary: A cross-sectional study.PloS one · 2022Article
- [Quality psychiatry and destigmatization : Can quality psychiatry and psychotherapy contribute to destigmatization of mental illnesses?]Der Nervenarzt · 2020Review
- Compulsory admissions of patients with mental disorders: State of the art on ethical and legislative aspects in 40 European countries.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2020Article
- Effectiveness of incentives and follow-up on increasing survey response rates and participation in field studies.BMC medical research methodology · 2019Article
- Associative stigma among mental health professionals in Singapore: a cross-sectional study.BMJ open · 2019Article
- Mental health professionals' attitudes towards mental illness: professional and cultural factors in the INTER NOS study.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2019Article
- Predicting Medical Students' Current Attitudes Toward Psychiatry, Interest in Psychiatry, and Estimated Likelihood of Working in Psychiatry: A Cross-Sectional Study in Four European Countries.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2018Article
- Public attitudes towards psychiatry and psychiatric treatment at the beginning of the 21st century: a systematic review and meta-analysis of population surveys.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2017Article
- The EPA guidance document series.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper explores causes, explanations and consequences of the negative image of psychiatry and develops recommendations for improvement. It is primarily based on a WPA guidance paper on how to combat the stigmatization of psychiatry and psychiatrists and a Medline search on related publications since 2010. Furthermore, focussing on potential causes and explanations, the authors performed a selective literature search regarding additional image-related issues such as mental health literacy and diagnostic and treatment issues. Underestimation of psychiatry results from both unjustified prejudices of the general public, mass media and healthcare professionals and psychiatry's own unfavourable coping with external and internal concerns. Issues related to unjustified devaluation of psychiatry include overestimation of coercion, associative stigma, lack of public knowledge, need to simplify complex mental issues, problem of the continuum between normality and psychopathology, competition with medical and non-medical disciplines and psychopharmacological treatment. Issues related to psychiatry's own contribution to being underestimated include lack of a clear professional identity, lack of biomarkers supporting clinical diagnoses, limited consensus about best treatment options, lack of collaboration with other medical disciplines and low recruitment rates among medical students. Recommendations are proposed for creating and representing a positive self-concept with different components. The negative image of psychiatry is not only due to unfavourable communication with the media, but is basically a problem of self-conceptualization. Much can be improved. However, psychiatry will remain a profession with an exceptional position among the medical disciplines, which should be seen as its specific strength.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.