Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26874689›Full record

ReviewDigestive diseases and sciences2016

Histological Assessment of NAFLD.

Pierre Bedossa

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. The metabolic basis of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis.Endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Pierre BedossaHôpital Beaujon, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris-Diderot, Paris, France. pierre.bedossa@aphp.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) covers a spectrum of histological lesions ranging from steatosis to a complex pattern with hepatocyte injury and inflammation in an appropriate clinical context. The disease has been artificially dichotomized into NAFL (steatosis) and NASH (steatosis with hepatocellular injury and inflammation), but it is increasingly clear that intermediate patterns may exist. More than NASH, the stage of fibrosis was shown to govern prognosis, and for such evaluation, a liver biopsy of adequate size and width is needed. Like for any other chronic liver diseases, semi-quantitative histologic scores have been proposed. They are not useful in clinical practice but concur to categorize homogeneous group of patients according to their histology. Pediatric NAFLD is a growing concern. While a subgroup of children may harbor different but characteristic histological patterns, most of them display a mixed pattern or features similar to the adults. Today, liver histology is the mainstay for clinical trials. Biopsy is used both for enrollment and for assessing benefit of clinical trials. End points such as reversion of NASH or regression of fibrosis are acceptable but require a clear histological definition.

Indexed as

BiomarkersBiopsyHepatocytesHumansInflammationLiverNon-alcoholic Fatty Liver DiseaseBiomarkersFibrosisLiver biopsyNAFLDNASH

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.