Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26874536›Full record

ReviewCurrent urology reports2016

Evolving Guidance on Ureteric Calculi Management in the Acute Setting.

Jonathan K Makanjuola, Sophie Rintoul-Hoad, Matthew Bultitude

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current urology reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jonathan K MakanjuolaThe Urology Centre, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, UK. jonathan.makanjuola@nhs.net.
Sophie Rintoul-HoadThe Urology Centre, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, UK. s.rintoul-hoad@doctors.org.uk.
Matthew BultitudeThe Urology Centre, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, UK. matthew.bultitude@gstt.nhs.uk.
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ureteric colic is a common presentation to acute emergency services. The gold standard test for the diagnosis of acute ureteric colic is a non-contrast computer tomography of the kidneys ureters and bladder (CT KUB). Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) should be used as first-line analgesia, with studies showing that there is no role for steroid or phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors. There is emerging evidence that a high body mass index (BMI) is a risk factor. The drugs used to facilitate stone passage are known as medical expulsive therapy (MET). The most evaluated being alpha-blockers. The Spontaneous Urinary Stone Passage Enabled by Drugs (SUSPEND) trial was designed to evaluate the use of MET (tamsulosin and nifedipine). This trial showed that there was no difference with MET and placebo for the spontaneous passage of ureteric stones. There is an emerging role for the use of primary ureteroscopy in the management of non-infective ureteric stones.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseDietHumansLife StyleNephrostomy, PercutaneousUreteral CalculiUreteroscopyComputer tomographyMedical expulsive therapyNephrostomyTamsulosinUreteric colicUreteroscopy

Identifiers

PMID26874536
OpenAlexW2263734438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.