Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26874532›Full record

ReviewCurrent urology reports2016

Pelvic Prolapse Repair in the Era of Mesh.

Natalie Gaines, Priyanka Gupta, Larry T Sirls

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current urology reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Evolution of drug-eluting biomedical implants for sustained drug delivery.European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics : official journal of Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Pharmazeutische Verfahrenstechnik e.V · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Natalie GainesFemale Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery Beaumont Health System, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, 3535 W. 13 Mile Road, Ste. 438, Royal Oak, MI, 48073, USA. Natalie.Gaines@beaumont.edu.
Priyanka GuptaFemale Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery Beaumont Health System, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, 3535 W. 13 Mile Road, Ste. 438, Royal Oak, MI, 48073, USA. Priyanka.Gupta@beaumont.edu.
Larry T SirlsFemale Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery Beaumont Health System, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, 3535 W. 13 Mile Road, Ste. 438, Royal Oak, MI, 48073, USA. Larry.Sirls@beaumont.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pelvic organ prolapse repair with mesh remains the gold standard for advanced prolapse. There are several surgical approaches available to the pelvic reconstructive surgeon. Prolapse repair can be performed vaginally or abdominally using native tissue or may be augmented with a biologic or mesh patch. In this article, we will review the different approaches to prolapse repair, the role of mesh, and the risks and benefits of each option. Patient selection, surgical technique, and the rationale for using mesh will be explored. Complications from prolapse repair with mesh including dyspareunia, pelvic pain, mesh exposure, and reoperation will be discussed.

Indexed as

Surgical MeshAnimalsHumansLaparoscopyPelvic Organ ProlapsePelvic PainReoperationRobotic Surgical ProceduresDyspareuniaMesh exposurePelvic organ prolapseSacrocolpopexyTransvaginal mesh repair

Identifiers

PMID26874532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.