Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26874473›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of chemical physics2016

Perspective: Computer simulations of long time dynamics.

Ron Elber

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of chemical physics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Milestoning estimators of dissipation in systems observed at a coarse resolution.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Life in silico: Are we close yet?Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  6. Molecular latent space simulators.Chemical science · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The allosteric switching mechanism in bacteriophage MS2.The Journal of chemical physics · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ron ElberDepartment of Chemistry, The Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, USA.

Funding

LONG TIME DYNAMICS OF BIOMOLECULESR01GM059796 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI ELBER, RON · 2000 to 2021
$5.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM 059796NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM059796
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Atomically detailed computer simulations of complex molecular events attracted the imagination of many researchers in the field as providing comprehensive information on chemical, biological, and physical processes. However, one of the greatest limitations of these simulations is of time scales. The physical time scales accessible to straightforward simulations are too short to address many interesting and important molecular events. In the last decade significant advances were made in different directions (theory, software, and hardware) that significantly expand the capabilities and accuracies of these techniques. This perspective describes and critically examines some of these advances.

Indexed as

Molecular Dynamics SimulationKinetics

Identifiers

PMID26874473
PMCPMC4752541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.