ArticleJACC. Heart failure2016
Cost-Effectiveness of Implantable Pulmonary Artery Pressure Monitoring in Chronic Heart Failure.
Article in JACC. Heart failure, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
50 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 103 citations in OpenAlex.
- Economic Evaluations of Digital Health Interventions for Patients With Heart Failure: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Pooled it
- Implanted haemodynamic telemonitoring devices to guide management of heart failure: a review and meta-analysis of randomised trials.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2023Pooled it
- Device-based remote monitoring strategies for congestion-guided management of patients with heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of heart failure · 2022Pooled it
- Valuing health-related quality of life in heart failure: a systematic review of methods to derive quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) in trial-based cost-utility analyses.Heart failure reviews · 2019Pooled it
- The Cost-Effectiveness of Digital Health Interventions on the Management of Cardiovascular Diseases: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2019Pooled it
- Outpatient Worsening Heart Failure as a Target for Therapy: A Review.JAMA cardiology · 2018Pooled it
- Cost-Effectiveness of Remote Cardiac Monitoring With the CardioMEMS Heart Failure System.Clinical cardiology · 2017Trial
- The cost-effectiveness of real-time pulmonary artery pressure monitoring in heart failure patients: a European perspective.European journal of heart failure · 2017Trial
- Pulmonary artery pressure-guided heart failure management: US cost-effectiveness analyses using the results of the CHAMPION clinical trial.European journal of heart failure · 2017Trial
- A Scoping Review of Methods for Extrapolating Costs and Effects in Economic Evaluations of Remote Monitoring.PharmacoEconomics - open · 2026Review
- Positioning-robust broadband microwave transmission as a minimal-complexity approach to thoracic dielectric sensing: simulation and phantom analysis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Remote pulmonary artery pressure-guided management of patients with heart failure: A clinical consensus statement of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC.European journal of heart failure · 2025Review
- Application of Telemedicine in the Management of Cardiovascular Diseases: A Focus on Heart Failure.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Review
- Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of a Heart Failure Management System in the United States.Journal of health economics and outcomes research · 2025Article
- The favourable alliance between CardioMEMS and levosimendan in patients with advanced heart failure.ESC heart failure · 2024Article
- Assessing the impact of haemodynamic monitoring with CardioMEMS on heart failure patients: a cost-benefit analysis.ESC heart failure · 2024Article
- Hemodynamic Monitoring of Pediatric Patients With Heart Failure and Pulmonary Hypertension Using CardioMEMS.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2024Article
- Ambulatory Hemodynamic Monitoring-Don't Forget the Little Ones!Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2024Article
- Use of a Cardiac Scale to Predict Heart Failure Events: Design of SCALE-HF 1.Circulation. Heart failure · 2023Observational
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the CardioMEMS (CardioMEMS Heart Failure System, St Jude Medical Inc, Atlanta, Georgia) device in patients with chronic heart failure.
backgroundThe CardioMEMS device, an implantable pulmonary artery pressure monitor, was shown to reduce hospitalizations for heart failure and improve quality of life in the CHAMPION (CardioMEMS Heart Sensor Allows Monitoring of Pressure to Improve Outcomes in NYHA Class III Heart Failure Patients) trial.
methodsWe developed a Markov model to determine the hospitalization, survival, quality of life, cost, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of CardioMEMS implantation compared with usual care among a CHAMPION trial cohort of patients with heart failure. We obtained event rates and utilities from published trial data; we used costs from literature estimates and Medicare reimbursement data. We performed subgroup analyses of preserved and reduced ejection fraction and an exploratory analysis in a lower-risk cohort on the basis of the CHARM (Candesartan in Heart failure: Reduction in Mortality and Morbidity) trials.
resultsCardioMEMS reduced lifetime hospitalizations (2.18 vs. 3.12), increased quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) (2.74 vs. 2.46), and increased costs ($176,648 vs. $156,569), thus yielding a cost of $71,462 per QALY gained and $48,054 per life-year gained. The cost per QALY gained was $82,301 in patients with reduced ejection fraction and $47,768 in those with preserved ejection fraction. In the lower-risk CHARM cohort, the device would need to reduce hospitalizations for heart failure by 41% to cost <$100,000 per QALY gained. The cost-effectiveness was most sensitive to the device's durability.
conclusionsIn populations similar to that of the CHAMPION trial, the CardioMEMS device is cost-effective if the trial effectiveness is sustained over long periods. Post-marketing surveillance data on durability will further clarify its value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.