Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26874299›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology2016

Universal cervical length screening: implementation and outcomes.

Lorene A Temming, Jennifer K Durst, Methodius G Tuuli, Molly J Stout, Jeffrey M Dicke, George A Macones, Alison G Cahill

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The Impact of Routine Transvaginal Ultrasound Measurement of the Cervical Length on the Prediction of Preterm Birth: A Retrospective Study in a Tertiary Hospital.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2021
    Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lorene A TemmingDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO. Electronic address: temmingl@wudosis.wustl.edu.
Jennifer K DurstDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO.
Methodius G TuuliDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO.
Molly J StoutDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO.
Jeffrey M DickeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO.
George A MaconesDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO.
Alison G CahillDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO.
Washington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational SciencesUL1TR000448 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EVANOFF, BRADLEY A · 2012 to 2016
$41.4M
Washington University Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center-Administrative Down Syndrome SupplementU54HD087011 · NICHD · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI CONSTANTINO, JOHN N. · 2015 to 2019
$7.1M
Reproductive Epidemiology Training Program at Washington University in St. LouisT32HD055172 · NICHD · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MADDEN, TESSA · 2009 to 2018
$2.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000448NICHD NIH HHS 5T32HD055172-07NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD055172NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD087011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTransvaginal measurement of cervical length (CL) has been advocated as a screening tool to prevent preterm birth, but controversy remains regarding the overall utility of universal screening.

objectiveWe aimed to evaluate the acceptability of a universal CL screening program. Additionally we evaluated risk factors associated with declining screening and subsequent delivery outcomes of women who accepted or declined screening. STUDY

designThis was a retrospective cohort study of transvaginal CL screening at a single institution from July 1, 2011, through December 31, 2014. Institutional protocol recommended transvaginal CL measurement at the time of anatomic survey between 17-23 weeks in all women with singleton, viable pregnancies, without current or planned cerclage, with patients able to opt out. Patients with CL ≤20 mm were considered to have clinically significant cervical shortening and were offered treatment. We assessed acceptance rate, risk factors for declining CL screening, and the trend of acceptance of CL screening over time. We also calculated the prevalence of CL ≤25, ≤20, and ≤15 mm, and estimated the association between CL screening and spontaneous preterm birth.

resultsOf 12,740 women undergoing anatomic survey during the study period, 10,871 (85.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 84.7-85.9%) underwent CL screening. Of those, 215 (2.0%) had a CL ≤25 mm and 131 (1.2%) had a CL ≤20 mm. After the first 6 months of implementation, there was no change in rates of acceptance of CL screening over time (P for trend = .15). Women were more likely to decline CL screening if they were African American (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.17; 95% CI, 1.93-2.44), obese (aOR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.06-1.31), multiparous (aOR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.29-1.64), age <35 years (aOR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.08-1.43), or smokers (aOR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.20-1.68). Rates of spontaneous preterm birth <28 weeks were higher in those who declined CL screening (aOR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.33-3.02).

conclusionUniversal CL screening was implemented successfully with 85% of women screened. Overall incidence of short cervix was low and women with significant risk factors for preterm birth were more likely to decline screening. Patients who declined CL screening were more likely to be African American, obese, multiparous, age <35 years, and smokers. Rates of early, but not late, spontaneous preterm birth were significantly higher among women who did not undergo CL screening.

Indexed as

Cervical Length MeasurementMass ScreeningBlack or African AmericanBlack PeopleCervix UteriCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaternal AgeMissouriObesityParityPatient Acceptance of Health CarePregnancyPremature BirthRetrospective Studiescervical length measurementcervical length screeningpreterm birthpreterm birth preventionvaginal progesterone

Identifiers

PMID26874299
PMCPMC4810783
OpenAlexW2254009818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.