Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26874189›Full record

ArticleThe Gerontologist2016

Attachment to Life: Psychometric Analyses of the Valuation of Life Scale and Differences Among Older Adults.

Laura N Gitlin, Jeanine Parisi, Jin Huang, Laraine Winter, David L Roth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Gerontologist, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Laura N GitlinCenter for Innovative Care in Aging, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland. lgitlin1@jhu.edu.
Jeanine ParisiJohns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Principal Faculty, Center for Innovative Care in Aging, Baltimore, Maryland.
Jin HuangDivision of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Center on Aging and Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Laraine WinterSchool of Nursing, Villanova University, Pennsylvania.
David L RothDivision of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Center on Aging and Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.

Funding

Treating Depression in African American Elders: A Community-Academic PartnershipR01MH079814 · NIMH · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI GITLIN, LAURA N. · 2007 to 2011
$2.9M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH079814
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of studyExamine psychometric properties of Lawton's Valuation of Life (VOL) scale, a measure of an older adults' assessment of the perceived value of their lives; and whether ratings differ by race (White, Black/African American) and sex. DESIGN AND

methodsThe 13-item VOL scale was administered at baseline in 2 separate randomized trials (Advancing Better Living for Elders, ABLE; Get Busy Get Better, GBGB) for a total of 527 older adults. Principal component analyses were applied to a subset of ABLE data (subsample 1) and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted on remaining data (subsample 2 and GBGB). Once the factor structure was identified and confirmed, 2 subscales were created, corresponding to optimism and engagement. Convergent validity of total and subscale scores were examined using measures of depressive symptoms, social support, control-oriented strategies, mastery, and behavioral activation. For discriminant validity, indices of health status, physical function, financial strain, cognitive status, and number of falls were examined.

resultsTrial samples (ABLE vs. GBGB) differed by age, race, marital status, education, and employment. Principal component analysis on ABLE subsample 1 (n = 156) yielded two factors subsequently confirmed in confirmatory factor analyses on ABLE subsample 2 (n = 163) and GBGB sample (N = 208) separately. Adequate fit was found for the 2-factor model. Correlational analyses supported strong convergent and discriminant validity. Some statistically significant race and sex differences in subscale scores were found. IMPLICATIONS: VOL measures subjective appraisals of perceived value of life. Consisting of two interrelated subscales, it offers an efficient approach to ascertain personal attributions.

Indexed as

AgingGeriatric AssessmentQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesValue of LifeAgedAged, 80 and overDepressionFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHealth StatusHumansMalePsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSocial SupportAffective well-beingBiographical managementQuality of life

Identifiers

PMID26874189
PMCPMC4873769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.