ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2016
Gene expression inference with deep learning.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 162 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
162 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Deep learning in gastric tissue diseases: a systematic review.BMJ open gastroenterology · 2020Pooled it
- Deep learning based attention enhanced phylogenetic radial basis function networks (AE-PRBFN) for genomic codon usage classification across species.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Application of deep learning in crop research: From genomics to phenomics.The plant genome · 2026Review
- In silico generation of gene expression profiles using diffusion models.BMC bioinformatics · 2026Article
- FT-MDNNMDs: early detection of breast cancer using fine-tuned multi-deep neural networks with TCGA and clinical image datasets.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Transplatformer: translating toxicogenomic profiles between generations of platforms.BMC bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Harnessing AI to fuse phenotypic signatures for drug target identification: progress in computational modeling.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- Inference of Gene-Gene Interaction and Its Function.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Deciphering fibroblast and myeloid-cell states in keloids: an integrative analysis identifies ANKRD1 as a ferroptosis-related candidate gene.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- ACmix-Swin Deep Learning of 4-Day-OldGenes · 2025Article
- Discriminative biomarker selection using hybrid multi-population evolutionary computation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The Current State and Future Prospects for Artificial Intelligence in Dermatology.Dermatologic clinics · 2025Review
- Identification of key genes for fish adaptation to freshwater and seawater based on attention mechanism.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Predicting Gene Expression Responses to Cold inGenes · 2025Article
- Metabolic reprogramming and functional crosstalk within the tumor microenvironment (TME) and A Multi-omics anticancer approach.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025Review
- Multiomics-Driven Drug-Cell Interaction Network for Chemotherapy Sensitivity Prediction in Metabolically Defined Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Subtypes.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2025Article
- Gene expression inference based on graph neural networks using L1000 data.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- The Strategy and Application of Gene Attenuation in Metabolic Engineering.Microorganisms · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence and Computational Biology in Gene Therapy: A Review.Biochemical genetics · 2025Review
- Gene regulatory network prediction using machine learning, deep learning, and hybrid approaches.Forestry research · 2025Article
102 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationLarge-scale gene expression profiling has been widely used to characterize cellular states in response to various disease conditions, genetic perturbations, etc. Although the cost of whole-genome expression profiles has been dropping steadily, generating a compendium of expression profiling over thousands of samples is still very expensive. Recognizing that gene expressions are often highly correlated, researchers from the NIH LINCS program have developed a cost-effective strategy of profiling only ∼1000 carefully selected landmark genes and relying on computational methods to infer the expression of remaining target genes. However, the computational approach adopted by the LINCS program is currently based on linear regression (LR), limiting its accuracy since it does not capture complex nonlinear relationship between expressions of genes.
resultsWe present a deep learning method (abbreviated as D-GEX) to infer the expression of target genes from the expression of landmark genes. We used the microarray-based Gene Expression Omnibus dataset, consisting of 111K expression profiles, to train our model and compare its performance to those from other methods. In terms of mean absolute error averaged across all genes, deep learning significantly outperforms LR with 15.33% relative improvement. A gene-wise comparative analysis shows that deep learning achieves lower error than LR in 99.97% of the target genes. We also tested the performance of our learned model on an independent RNA-Seq-based GTEx dataset, which consists of 2921 expression profiles. Deep learning still outperforms LR with 6.57% relative improvement, and achieves lower error in 81.31% of the target genes. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: D-GEX is available at https://github.com/uci-cbcl/D-GEX CONTACT: xhx@ics.uci.edu SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.