Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26873686›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2016

Impact of Nitrate Use on Survival in Acute Heart Failure: A Propensity-Matched Analysis.

Edwin C Ho, John D Parker, Peter C Austin, Jack V Tu, Xuesong Wang, Douglas S Lee

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Clinical Review of Hypertensive Acute Heart Failure.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Edwin C HoInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada University of Toronto, Canada.
John D ParkerDivision of Cardiology, Mt. Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada University of Toronto, Canada.
Peter C AustinInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada University of Toronto, Canada.
Jack V TuInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Division of Cardiology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada University of Toronto, Canada.
Xuesong WangInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Douglas S LeeInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Peter Munk Cardiac Centre and Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada University of Toronto, Canada dlee@ices.on.ca.
Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research MOP 114937
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is limited evidence that the use of nitrates in acute decompensated heart failure early after presentation to a hospital can improve clinical outcomes. We aimed to determine whether early nitrate exposure is associated with improved survival in a large retrospective cohort study. METHODS AND

resultsWe examined 11 078 acute decompensated heart failure patients who presented to emergency departments in Ontario, Canada, between 2004 and 2007, in the Enhanced Feedback For Effective Cardiac Treatment and the Emergency Heart failure Mortality Risk Grade studies. In propensity-matched analyses, we examined the effect of nitrate administration in the acute emergency department setting for its impact on death at 7, 30, and 365 days. In propensity-matched analyses, we found no difference in survival between those who received nitrates in the emergency department and the non-nitrate comparator group. Hazard ratios for mortality were 0.76 (95% CI; 0.51, 1.12) over 7 days, 0.97 (95% CI; 0.77, 1.21) over 30 days, and 0.91 (95% CI; 0.82, 1.02) over 1 year of follow-up. There was no significant difference in survival or hospital length of stay between nitrate and non-nitrate controls in extended follow-up. There was also no significant effect of nitrates in subgroups stratified by presence of chest pain, troponin elevation, chronic nitrate use, and known coronary artery disease.

conclusionsIn acute decompensated heart failure, use of nitrates acutely in the emergency department setting was not associated with improvement in short-term or near-term survival. Our study does not support generalized use of nitrates when the primary goal of therapy is to reduce mortality.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAgedAged, 80 and overCardiology Service, HospitalCardiovascular AgentsChi-Square DistributionEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHeart FailureHumansLogistic ModelsMaleNitratesOntarioPropensity ScoreProportional Hazards ModelsCardiovascular AgentsNitratesanginachronic ischemic heart diseasecoronary artery diseasehealth servicesheart failuremortality/survivalmyocardial infarctionquality and outcomesstatements and guidelines

Identifiers

PMID26873686
PMCPMC4802454
OpenAlexW2268777340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.