Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26873590›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2016

Vitamin D deficiency as adverse drug reaction? A cross-sectional study in Dutch geriatric outpatients.

A C B van Orten-Luiten, A Janse, R A M Dhonukshe-Rutten, R F Witkamp

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Medications and Micronutrients: Identifying Clinically Relevant Interactions and Addressing Nutritional Needs.The Journal of pharmacy technology : jPT : official publication of the Association of Pharmacy Technicians · 2018
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Public health relevance of drug-nutrition interactions.European journal of nutrition · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

A C B van Orten-LuitenDivision of Human Nutrition, Pharmacology and Nutrition, Wageningen University, P.O. Box 8129, 6700 EV, Wageningen, The Netherlands. wout.vanorten-luiten@wur.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5375-4004
A JanseDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, Gelderse Vallei Hospital, Willy Brandtlaan 10, 6716 RP, Ede, The Netherlands.
R A M Dhonukshe-RuttenDivision of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University, P.O. Box 8129, 6700 EV, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
R F WitkampDivision of Human Nutrition, Pharmacology and Nutrition, Wageningen University, P.O. Box 8129, 6700 EV, Wageningen, The Netherlands. renger.witkamp@wur.nl.
Wageningen University & Research · NLZiekenhuis Gelderse Vallei · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAdverse drug reactions as well as vitamin D deficiency are issues of public health concern in older people. However, relatively little is known about the impact of drug use on vitamin D status. Our primary aim is to explore associations between drug use and vitamin D status in older people. Furthermore, prevalences of drug use and vitamin D deficiency are estimated.

methodsIn a population of 873 community-dwelling Dutch geriatric outpatients, we explored the cross-sectional relationships of polypharmacy (≥5 medications concomitantly used), severe polypharmacy (≥10 medications), and use of twenty-one specific drug groups, with serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) by analysis of covariance.

resultsOverall prevalence of polypharmacy was 65 %, of severe polypharmacy 22 %. Depending on the cut-off value, prevalence of vitamin D deficiency was 49 % (<50 nmol/l) or 77 % (<75 nmol/l). Of the patients using a vitamin D supplement, 17 % (<50 nmol/l) or 49 % (<75 nmol/l) were still deficient. In non-users of supplemental vitamin D, after adjustment for age and gender, negative associations were found for severe polypharmacy, metformin, sulphonamides and urea derivatives (SUDs), vitamin K antagonists, cardiac glycosides, loop diuretics, potassium-sparing diuretics, ACE inhibitors, and serotonin reuptake inhibitors; for non-selective monoamine reuptake inhibitors (NSMRIs) the association was positive. The most extreme impacts of drug use on adjusted mean 25(OH)D were -19 nmol/l for SUDs and +18 nmol/l for NSMRIs.

conclusionDrug use should be considered a risk factor for vitamin D deficiency amongst geriatric outpatients.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsDrug UtilizationFemaleHumansMaleNetherlandsOutpatientsPolypharmacyVitamin DVitamin D Deficiency25-hydroxyvitamin DVitamin DAdverse drug reactionDrug-food interactionElderlyPolypharmacyVitamin D

Identifiers

PMID26873590
PMCPMC4834096
OpenAlexW2264991795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.