Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26873351›Full record

ArticleActa paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992)2016

Body fat measurement in adolescent girls with type 1 diabetes: a comparison of skinfold equations against dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

S Särnblad, A Magnuson, U Ekelund, J Åman

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyControlled Clinical TrialValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

S SärnbladFaculty of Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden. stefan.sarnblad@oru.se.
A MagnusonFaculty of Medical Sciences, Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
U EkelundDepartment of Sport Medicine, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway.
J ÅmanFaculty of Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Örebro University · SEMedical Research Council · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_12015/3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimSkinfold measurement is an inexpensive and widely used technique for assessing the percentage of body fat (%BF). This study assessed the accuracy of prediction equations for %BF based on skinfold measurements compared to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in girls with type 1 diabetes and healthy age-matched controls.

methodsWe included 49 healthy girls and 44 girls with diabetes aged 12-19 years old, comparing the predicted %BF based on skinfold measurements and the %BF values obtained by a Lunar DPX-L scanner. The agreement between the methods was assessed using an Bland-Altman plot.

resultsThe skinfold measurements were significantly higher in girls with diabetes (p = 0.003) despite a nonsignificant difference in total %BF (p = 0.1). A significant association between bias and %BF was found for all tested equations in the Bland-Altman plots. Regression analysis showed that the association between skinfold measurements and %BF measured by DXA differed significantly (p = 0.039) between the girls with diabetes and the healthy controls.

conclusionThe accuracy of skinfold thickness equations for assessment of %BF in adolescent girls with diabetes is poor in comparison with DXA measurements as criterion. Our findings highlight the need for the development of new prediction equations for girls with type 1 diabetes.

Indexed as

Absorptiometry, PhotonAdipositySkinfold ThicknessAdolescentDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1FemaleHumansMaleAdolescentsBody compositionDual-energy X-ray absorptiometrySkinfold measurementsType 1 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID26873351
PMCPMC5031196
OpenAlexW2270075935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.