Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26872472›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical ecology2016

Measurements of Chlorpyrifos Levels in Forager Bees and Comparison with Levels that Disrupt Honey Bee Odor-Mediated Learning Under Laboratory Conditions.

Elodie Urlacher, Coline Monchanin, Coraline Rivière, Freddie-Jeanne Richard, Christie Lombardi, Sue Michelsen-Heath, Kimberly J Hageman, Alison R Mercer

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical ecology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Changes in responsiveness to allatostatin treatment accompany shifts in stress reactivity in young worker honey bees.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Elodie UrlacherUniversity of Otago, Department of Zoology, 340 Great King Street PO Box 56, Dunedin, 9054, New Zealand. elodie.urlacher@otago.ac.nz.
Coline MonchaninUniversity of Otago, Department of Zoology, 340 Great King Street PO Box 56, Dunedin, 9054, New Zealand.
Coraline RivièreUniversity of Otago, Department of Zoology, 340 Great King Street PO Box 56, Dunedin, 9054, New Zealand.
Freddie-Jeanne RichardLaboratoire Ecologie et Biologie des intéractions, UMR CNRS 7267, Team Ecologie Evolution Symbiose, University of Poitiers, 6, rue Michel Brunet, TSA 51106, F-86073, Poitiers Cedex 9, France.
Christie LombardiDepartment of Chemistry, University of Otago, Union Street West, PO Box 56, Dunedin, 9054, New Zealand.
Sue Michelsen-HeathUniversity of Otago, Department of Zoology, 340 Great King Street PO Box 56, Dunedin, 9054, New Zealand.
Kimberly J HagemanDepartment of Chemistry, University of Otago, Union Street West, PO Box 56, Dunedin, 9054, New Zealand.
Alison R MercerUniversity of Otago, Department of Zoology, 340 Great King Street PO Box 56, Dunedin, 9054, New Zealand.
University of Otago · NZÉcologie et Biologie des Interactions · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chlorpyrifos is an organophosphate pesticide used around the world to protect food crops against insects and mites. Despite guidelines for chlorpyrifos usage, including precautions to protect beneficial insects, such as honeybees from spray drift, this pesticide has been detected in bees in various countries, indicating that exposure still occurs. Here, we examined chlorpyrifos levels in bees collected from 17 locations in Otago, New Zealand, and compared doses of this pesticide that cause sub-lethal effects on learning performance under laboratory conditions with amounts of chlorpyrifos detected in the bees in the field. The pesticide was detected at 17 % of the sites sampled and in 12 % of the colonies examined. Amounts detected ranged from 35 to 286 pg.bee(-1), far below the LD50 of ~100 ng.bee(-1). We detected no adverse effect of chlorpyrifos on aversive learning, but the formation and retrieval of appetitive olfactory memories was severely affected. Chlorpyrifos fed to bees in amounts several orders of magnitude lower than the LD50, and also lower than levels detected in bees, was found to slow appetitive learning and reduce the specificity of memory recall. As learning and memory play a central role in the behavioral ecology and communication of foraging bees, chlorpyrifos, even in sublethal doses, may threaten the success and survival of this important insect pollinator.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalOdorantsAnimalsBeesChlorpyrifosInsecticidesLearningChlorpyrifosInsecticidesAppetitive learningChlorpyrifosField measurementsHoney beeMemory specificity

Identifiers

PMID26872472
OpenAlexW2262355509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.