ArticleGlobal change biology2016
Benchmarking novel approaches for modelling species range dynamics.
Article in Global change biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Understanding Beech Predominance Through Sapling and Adult Demography Along Environmental Gradients.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Models used for Red List assessments underestimate climate-related extinction risk of range-shifting species.Nature ecology & evolution · 2026Article
- Optimized MaxEnt Models Predict Species-Specific Habitat Suitability Shifts for Three Dryland Fabaceae Species in Xinjiang.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Spatial Partitioning Among Three Sympatric Ungulates in the Tibetan Plateau: Identifying Critical Variables.Integrative zoology · 2026Article
- Integrating Environmental Drivers and Trophic Interactions to Predict Spatial Distribution of High-Risk Marine Organisms at Nuclear Power Plant Cooling Water Intake.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Paleorecords Reveal Biological Mechanisms Crucial for Reliable Species Range Shift Projections Amid Rapid Climate Change.Ecology letters · 2025Article
- Life-history adaptation under climate warming magnifies the agricultural footprint of a cosmopolitan insect pest.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Bending the curve of biodiversity loss requires a 'satnav' for nature.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025Article
- MetaRange.jl: A Dynamic and Metabolic Species Range Model for Plant Species.Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- Climate-Smart Siting for renewable energy expansion.iScience · 2024Review
- Range and climate niche shifts in European and North American breeding birds.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024Article
- A species' response to spatial climatic variation does not predict its response to climate change.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Demography-environment relationships improve mechanistic understanding of range dynamics under climate change.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023Article
- A quixotic view of spatial bias in modelling the distribution of species and their diversity.npj biodiversity · 2023Review
- Recommendations for quantifying and reducing uncertainty in climate projections of species distributions.Global change biology · 2022Article
- Model-based extrapolation of ecological systems under future climate scenarios: The example of Ixodes ricinus ticks.PloS one · 2022Article
- Drivers ofEcology and evolution · 2021Article
- Can dynamic occupancy models improve predictions of species' range dynamics? A test using Swiss birds.Global change biology · 2021Article
- Linking functional traits and demography to model species-rich communities.Nature communications · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Increasing biodiversity loss due to climate change is one of the most vital challenges of the 21st century. To anticipate and mitigate biodiversity loss, models are needed that reliably project species' range dynamics and extinction risks. Recently, several new approaches to model range dynamics have been developed to supplement correlative species distribution models (SDMs), but applications clearly lag behind model development. Indeed, no comparative analysis has been performed to evaluate their performance. Here, we build on process-based, simulated data for benchmarking five range (dynamic) models of varying complexity including classical SDMs, SDMs coupled with simple dispersal or more complex population dynamic models (SDM hybrids), and a hierarchical Bayesian process-based dynamic range model (DRM). We specifically test the effects of demographic and community processes on model predictive performance. Under current climate, DRMs performed best, although only marginally. Under climate change, predictive performance varied considerably, with no clear winners. Yet, all range dynamic models improved predictions under climate change substantially compared to purely correlative SDMs, and the population dynamic models also predicted reasonable extinction risks for most scenarios. When benchmarking data were simulated with more complex demographic and community processes, simple SDM hybrids including only dispersal often proved most reliable. Finally, we found that structural decisions during model building can have great impact on model accuracy, but prior system knowledge on important processes can reduce these uncertainties considerably. Our results reassure the clear merit in using dynamic approaches for modelling species' response to climate change but also emphasize several needs for further model and data improvement. We propose and discuss perspectives for improving range projections through combination of multiple models and for making these approaches operational for large numbers of species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.