Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26872305›Full record

ArticleGlobal change biology2016

Benchmarking novel approaches for modelling species range dynamics.

Damaris Zurell, Wilfried Thuiller, Jörn Pagel, Juliano S Cabral, Tamara Münkemüller, Dominique Gravel, Stefan Dullinger, Signe Normand, Katja H Schiffers, Kara A Moore and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global change biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Bending the curve of biodiversity loss requires a 'satnav' for nature.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Range and climate niche shifts in European and North American breeding birds.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  13. A species' response to spatial climatic variation does not predict its response to climate change.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  14. Demography-environment relationships improve mechanistic understanding of range dynamics under climate change.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Drivers ofEcology and evolution · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Damaris ZurellDynamic Macroecology, Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL, Zürcherstrasse 111, CH-8903, Birmensdorf, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-4628-3558
Wilfried ThuillerUniv. Grenoble Alpes, Laboratoire d'Écologie Alpine (LECA), UMR-CNRS 5553 Université J. Fourier BP 53, F-38000, Grenoble, France.
Jörn PagelInstitute of Landscape and Plant Ecology, University of Hohenheim, August-v.Hartmann-Str. 3, D-70599, Stuttgart, Germany.
Juliano S CabralBiodiversity, Macroecology and Conservation Biogeography, University Göttingen, Büsgenweg 2, D-37077, Goettingen, Germany.
Tamara MünkemüllerUniv. Grenoble Alpes, Laboratoire d'Écologie Alpine (LECA), UMR-CNRS 5553 Université J. Fourier BP 53, F-38000, Grenoble, France.
Dominique GravelUniversité de Québec à Rimouski, 300 Allée des Ursulines, Rimouski, Canada, G5L 3A1.
Stefan DullingerDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Vienna, Rennweg 14, 1030, Vienna, Austria.
Signe NormandSection for Ecoinformatics and Biodiversity, Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, Ny Munkegade 114, DK-8000, Aarhus C, Denmark.
Katja H SchiffersUniv. Grenoble Alpes, Laboratoire d'Écologie Alpine (LECA), UMR-CNRS 5553 Université J. Fourier BP 53, F-38000, Grenoble, France.
Kara A MooreCenter for Population Biology, University of California, Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Niklaus E ZimmermannDynamic Macroecology, Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL, Zürcherstrasse 111, CH-8903, Birmensdorf, Switzerland.

Funding

European Research Council 281422
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increasing biodiversity loss due to climate change is one of the most vital challenges of the 21st century. To anticipate and mitigate biodiversity loss, models are needed that reliably project species' range dynamics and extinction risks. Recently, several new approaches to model range dynamics have been developed to supplement correlative species distribution models (SDMs), but applications clearly lag behind model development. Indeed, no comparative analysis has been performed to evaluate their performance. Here, we build on process-based, simulated data for benchmarking five range (dynamic) models of varying complexity including classical SDMs, SDMs coupled with simple dispersal or more complex population dynamic models (SDM hybrids), and a hierarchical Bayesian process-based dynamic range model (DRM). We specifically test the effects of demographic and community processes on model predictive performance. Under current climate, DRMs performed best, although only marginally. Under climate change, predictive performance varied considerably, with no clear winners. Yet, all range dynamic models improved predictions under climate change substantially compared to purely correlative SDMs, and the population dynamic models also predicted reasonable extinction risks for most scenarios. When benchmarking data were simulated with more complex demographic and community processes, simple SDM hybrids including only dispersal often proved most reliable. Finally, we found that structural decisions during model building can have great impact on model accuracy, but prior system knowledge on important processes can reduce these uncertainties considerably. Our results reassure the clear merit in using dynamic approaches for modelling species' response to climate change but also emphasize several needs for further model and data improvement. We propose and discuss perspectives for improving range projections through combination of multiple models and for making these approaches operational for large numbers of species.

Indexed as

BenchmarkingClimate ChangeEcosystemBayes TheoremClimateModels, BiologicalPopulation Dynamicsclimate changedemographic modelsdispersalpopulation viabilitypredictionsimulated dataspecies distribution modelsvirtual ecologist approach

Identifiers

PMID26872305
PMCPMC4972146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.