Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26872263›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Epineurial Window Is More Efficient in Attracting Axons than Simple Coaptation in a Sutureless (Cyanoacrylate-Bound) Model of End-to-Side Nerve Repair in the Rat Upper Limb: Functional and Morphometric Evidences and Review of the Literature.

Igor Papalia, Ludovico Magaudda, Maria Righi, Giulia Ronchi, Nicoletta Viano, Stefano Geuna, Michele Rosario Colonna

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. A novel chronic nerve compression model in the rat.Neural regeneration research · 2018
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Igor PapaliaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Ludovico MagauddaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Maria RighiDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Giulia RonchiDepartment of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Torino, Orbassano (Torino), Italy.
Nicoletta VianoDepartment of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Torino, Orbassano (Torino), Italy.
Stefano GeunaDepartment of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Torino, Orbassano (Torino), Italy.
Michele Rosario ColonnaDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Surgical and Medical Specialties, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
University of Messina · ITNeuroscience Institute · ITUniversity of Turin · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

End-to-side nerve coaptation brings regenerating axons from the donor to the recipient nerve. Several techniques have been used to perform coaptation: microsurgical sutures with and without opening a window into the epi(peri)neurial connective tissue; among these, window techniques have been proven more effective in inducing axonal regeneration. The authors developed a sutureless model of end-to-side coaptation in the rat upper limb. In 19 adult Wistar rats, the median and the ulnar nerves of the left arm were approached from the axillary region, the median nerve transected and the proximal stump sutured to the pectoral muscle to prevent regeneration. Animals were then randomly divided in two experimental groups (7 animals each, 5 animals acting as control): Group 1: the distal stump of the transected median nerve was fixed to the ulnar nerve by applying cyanoacrylate solution; Group 2: a small epineurial window was opened into the epineurium of the ulnar nerve, caring to avoid damage to the nerve fibres; the distal stump of the transected median nerve was then fixed to the ulnar nerve by applying cyanoacrylate solution. The grasping test for functional evaluation was repeated every 10-11 weeks starting from week-15, up to the sacrifice (week 36). At week 36, the animals were sacrificed and the regenerated nerves harvested and processed for morphological investigations (high-resolution light microscopy as well as stereological and morphometrical analysis). This study shows that a) cyanoacrylate in end-to-side coaptation produces scarless axon regeneration without toxic effects; b) axonal regeneration and myelination occur even without opening an epineurial window, but c) the window is related to a larger number of regenerating fibres, especially myelinated and mature, and better functional outcomes.

Indexed as

AdhesivesAnimalsAxonsCyanoacrylatesFemaleMedian NerveMyelin SheathNerve EndingsNerve RegenerationNeurosurgical ProceduresRatsRats, WistarRecovery of FunctionTreatment OutcomeUlnar NerveUpper ExtremityAdhesivesCyanoacrylates

Identifiers

PMID26872263
PMCPMC4752340
OpenAlexW2270075204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.