ArticlePloS one2016
A Microfluidic Channel Method for Rapid Drug-Susceptibility Testing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.
- Microfluidic point-of-care testing for antimicrobial resistance: advances, strategies, and One Health perspectives.Science in One Health · 2026Review
- Rapid antimicrobial susceptibility tests performed by self-diluting microfluidic chips for drug resistance studies and point-of-care diagnostics.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2025Article
- Article
- Microfluidic technologies for advanced antimicrobial susceptibility testing.Biomicrofluidics · 2024Review
- Growth Independent Morphometric Machine Learning Workflow for Single-Cell Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing ofFrontiers in imaging (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Computer vision meets microfluidics: a label-free method for high-throughput cell analysis.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2023Review
- Single-cell pathogen diagnostics for combating antibiotic resistance.Nature reviews. Methods primers · 2023Article
- Early appropriate diagnostics and treatment of MDR Gram-negative infections.JAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2022Review
- Metabolic preference assay for rapid diagnosis of bloodstream infections.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Microfluidic devices for studying bacterial taxis, drug testing and biofilm formation.Microbial biotechnology · 2022Review
- On the Wireless Microwave Sensing of Bacterial Membrane Potential in Microfluidic-Actuated Platforms.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Rapid Methods for Antimicrobial Resistance Diagnostics.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Current state of the art in rapid diagnostics for antimicrobial resistance.Lab on a chip · 2020Review
- Capillary-Driven Flow Microfluidics Combined with Smartphone Detection: An Emerging Tool for Point-of-Care Diagnostics.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2020Article
- Modern Tools for Rapid Diagnostics of Antimicrobial Resistance.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020Review
- 3D microfluidic gradient generator for combination antimicrobial susceptibility testing.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2020Article
- Article
- Toward point-of-care assessment of patient response: a portable tool for rapidly assessing cancer drug efficacy using multifrequency impedance cytometry and supervised machine learning.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2019Article
- Sensitive, Real-time and Non-Intrusive Detection of Concentration and Growth of Pathogenic Bacteria using Microfluidic-Microwave Ring Resonator Biosensor.Scientific reports · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The recent global increase in the prevalence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and lack of development of new therapeutic agents emphasize the importance of selecting appropriate antimicrobials for the treatment of infections. However, to date, the development of completely accelerated drug susceptibility testing methods has not been achieved despite the availability of a rapid identification method. We proposed an innovative rapid method for drug susceptibility testing for Pseudomonas aeruginosa that provides results within 3 h. The drug susceptibility testing microfluidic (DSTM) device was prepared using soft lithography. It consisted of five sets of four microfluidic channels sharing one inlet slot, and the four channels are gathered in a small area, permitting simultaneous microscopic observation. Antimicrobials were pre-introduced into each channel and dried before use. Bacterial suspensions in cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth were introduced from the inlet slot and incubated for 3 h. Susceptibilities were microscopically evaluated on the basis of differences in cell numbers and shapes between drug-treated and control cells, using dedicated software. The results of 101 clinically isolated strains of P. aeruginosa obtained using the DSTM method strongly correlated with results obtained using the ordinary microbroth dilution method. Ciprofloxacin, meropenem, ceftazidime, and piperacillin caused elongation in susceptible cells, while meropenem also induced spheroplast and bulge formation. Morphological observation could alternatively be used to determine the susceptibility of P. aeruginosa to these drugs, although amikacin had little effect on cell shape. The rapid determination of bacterial drug susceptibility using the DSTM method could also be applicable to other pathogenic species, and it could easily be introduced into clinical laboratories without the need for expensive instrumentation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.