Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26871978›Full record

ArticleJournal of women's health (2002)2016

Metabolic Effects of a Commonly Used Combined Hormonal Oral Contraceptive in Women With and Without Polycystic Ovary Syndrome.

Adeola A Adeniji, Paulina A Essah, John E Nestler, Kai I Cheang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of women's health (2002), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Impact of contraception and IVF hormones on metabolic, endocrine, and inflammatory status.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2020 · on this map
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Physiology (Bethesda, Md.) · 2017
    Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Adeola A Adeniji1 Department of Pharmacotherapy & Outcomes Science, School of Pharmacy, Virginia Commonwealth University , Richmond, Virginia.
Paulina A Essah2 Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University , Richmond, Virginia.
John E Nestler2 Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University , Richmond, Virginia.
Kai I Cheang1 Department of Pharmacotherapy & Outcomes Science, School of Pharmacy, Virginia Commonwealth University , Richmond, Virginia.

Funding

Center for Clinical and Translational ResearchUL1TR000058 · NCATS · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI MOELLER, FREDERICK GERARD · 2012 to 2015
$12.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000058
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundData on combined hormonal oral contraceptives' (OCs) effects on metabolic changes in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) have been conflicting and were predominantly based on OCs with cyproterone acetate (unavailable in the United States) Most studies did not include normal women as controls. We compared metabolic changes before and after an OC commonly used in the United States between women with and without PCOS.

methodsTen PCOS and 20 control women took ethinyl estradiol 35 μg and norgestimate 0.18/0.215/0.25 mg. Fasting glucose and insulin, area-under-the-curve (AUC) glucose and insulin, insulin sensitivity (homeostatic model assessment of insulin sensitivity index [HOMA-ISI] and Matsuda index), insulinogenic index (Δinsulin0-30 minutes/Δglucose0-30 minutes), blood pressure, and lipids were evaluated at baseline and after three cycles of OC.

resultsAt baseline, PCOS women had lower insulin sensitivity (Matsuda index p = 0.0093, HOMA-ISI p = 0.0397), higher fasting insulin (p = 0.0495), fasting glucose (p = 0.0393), AUC insulin (p = 0.0023), and triglycerides (p = 0.0044) versus controls. Baseline AUC glucose did not differ between PCOS women and controls. After 3 months of OC use, glucose tolerance worsened in PCOS women versus controls (p = 0.0468). Higher baseline androgens were predictive of worsened glucose tolerance, and a reduction of AUC insulin during OC use. The insulinogenic index significantly decreased in PCOS women (p < 0.01), while fasting insulin and insulin resistance significantly worsened in control women.

conclusionWomen with PCOS exhibited worsened glucose tolerance (demonstrated by AUC glucose) after 3 months of a commonly used OC compared with control women. Larger studies with longer follow-up should confirm these findings.

Indexed as

AdultBlood GlucoseCarbohydratesCase-Control StudiesContraceptives, OralContraceptives, Oral, CombinedContraceptives, Oral, HormonalDose-Response Relationship, DrugEstrogensEthinyl EstradiolFemaleGlucose Tolerance TestGonadal Steroid HormonesHumansInsulinLipid MetabolismBlood GlucoseCarbohydratesContraceptives, OralContraceptives, Oral, CombinedContraceptives, Oral, HormonalEstrogensEthinyl EstradiolGonadal Steroid HormonesInsulinLipidsnorgestimateNorgestrel

Identifiers

PMID26871978
PMCPMC4900190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.