Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26871898›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2016

Control of Trachoma from Achham District, Nepal: A Cross-Sectional Study from the Nepal National Trachoma Program.

Bidya Prasad Pant, Ramesh C Bhatta, J S P Chaudhary, Suresh Awasthi, Sailesh Mishra, Shekhar Sharma, Puja A Cuddapah, Sarah E Gwyn, Nicole E Stoller, Diana L Martin and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Monitoring transmission intensity of trachoma with serology.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Can we eradicate trachoma? A survey of stakeholders.The British journal of ophthalmology · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Ocular Chlamydia trachomatis Infection Under the Surgery, Antibiotics, Facial Cleanliness, and Environmental Improvement Strategy in Amhara, Ethiopia, 2011-2015.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Models of Trachoma Transmission and Their Policy Implications: From Control to Elimination.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2018
    Review
  14. Prevalence ofThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Bidya Prasad PantGeta Eye Hospital, Dhangadhi, Nepal.
Ramesh C BhattaGeta Eye Hospital, Dhangadhi, Nepal.
J S P ChaudharyGeta Eye Hospital, Dhangadhi, Nepal.
Suresh AwasthiGeta Eye Hospital, Dhangadhi, Nepal.
Sailesh MishraNepal Netra Jyoti Sangh, Tripureswor, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Shekhar SharmaNepal Netra Jyoti Sangh, Tripureswor, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Puja A CuddapahF.I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Sarah E GwynDivision of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Nicole E StollerF.I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Diana L MartinDivision of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Jeremy D KeenanF.I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Thomas M LietmanF.I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Bruce D GaynorF.I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Tilganga Institute of Ophthalmology · NPSan Francisco Foundation · USCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USNepal Red Cross Society · NPUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

CTSA: K12 COMPONENTKL2RR024130 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI JOHNSTON, S. CLAIBORNE · 2006 to 2011
$19.3M
Primary and Secondary Effects of Mass Antibiotic Distributions for TrachomaK23EY019881 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI GAYNOR, BRUCE D. · 2010 to 2014
$1.1M
NCRR NIH HHS KL2 RR024130NEI NIH HHS K23 EY019881PHS HHS K23 EYO19881-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe WHO seeks to control trachoma as a public health problem in endemic areas. Achham District in western Nepal was found to have TF (trachoma follicular) above 20% in a 2006 government survey, triggering 3 annual mass drug administrations finishing in 2010. Here we assess the level of control that has been achieved using surveillance for clinical disease, ocular chlamydia trachomatis infection, and serology for antibodies against chlamydia trachomatis protein antigens.

methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional survey of children aged 1-9 years in communities in Achham District in early 2014 including clinical examination validated with photographs, conjunctival samples for Chlamydia trachomatis (Amplicor PCR), and serological testing for antibodies against chlamydia trachomatis protein antigens pgp3 and CT694 using the Luminex platform.

findingsIn 24 randomly selected communities, the prevalence of trachoma (TF and/or TI) in 1-9 year olds was 3/1124 (0.3%, 95% CI 0.1 to 0.8%), and the prevalence of ocular chlamydia trachomatis infection was 0/1124 (0%, 95% CI 0 to 0.3%). In 18 communities selected because they had the highest prevalence of trachoma in a previous survey, the prevalence of TF and/or TI was 7/716 (1.0%, 95% CI 0.4 to 2.0%) and the prevalence of ocular chlamydia trachomatis infection was 0/716 (0%, 95% CI 0 to 0.5%). In 3 communities selected for serological testing, the prevalence of trachoma was 0/68 (0%, 95% CI 0 to 5.3%), the prevalence of ocular chlamydia trachomatis infection was 0/68 (0%, 95% CI 0 to 0.5%), the prevalence of antibodies against chlamydia trachomatis protein antigen pgp3 was 1/68 (1.5%, 95% CI 0.04% to 7.9%), and the prevalence of antibodies against chlamydia trachomatis protein antigen CT694 was 0/68 (0%, 95% CI 0 to 5.3%). CONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE: This previously highly endemic district in Nepal has little evidence of recent clinical disease, chlamydia trachomatis infection, or serological evidence of trachoma, suggesting that epidemiological control has been achieved.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsChildChild, PreschoolChlamydia trachomatisCross-Sectional StudiesHumansInfantMaleNepalPrevalenceTrachomaAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID26871898
PMCPMC4752456
OpenAlexW2255337139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.