Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26871775›Full record

SynthesisMedicine2016

The Efficacy and Safety of Antiinterleukin 13, a Monoclonal Antibody, in Adult Patients With Asthma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Jian Luo, Dan Liu, Chun-Tao Liu

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Update on the Role of FeNO in Asthma Management.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Exhaled nitric oxide measurements are not influenced by anti-eosinophil therapy in patients with asthma: A retrospective analysis.Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jian LuoFrom the Department of Respiratory Medicine (JL, C-TL); and Department of Critical Care Medicine (DL), West China School of Medicine and West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Dan Liu
Chun-Tao Liu
Sichuan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Effects of antiinterleukin 13 therapies in patients with asthma remain inconsistent. Therefore, we aimed to further clarify the efficacy and safety of antiinterleukin 13 therapies in adult asthmatics by a systematic review and meta-analysis.Randomized controlled trials which reported pulmonary functions, fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ), rescue use of short-acting-β-agonist (SABA), and rate of asthmatic exacerbation and adverse events were identified in Pubmed, Embase, Medline, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), American College of Physician (ACP) Journal Club, and ISI Web of Science, reference lists and by manual searches. Randomized-effect models were used in meta-analysis to calculate pooled mean difference and relative risks (RR).Eight studies with 957 patients were enrolled. Systematic review showed that treatment with antiinterleukin 13 antibodies could significantly improve peak expiratory flow (PEF), decrease FeNO and asthmatic exacerbation, but could not decrease blood and sputum eosinophil levels, improve FEV1, inhibit methacholine PC20, or reduce ACQ scores. Two studies reported opposite results in reducing rescue use of SABA. Meta-analysis showed that antiinterleukin 13 monoclonal therapies could significantly decrease asthmatic exacerbation (RR 0.55, 95% CI: 0.31-0.96, z = 2.10, P = 0.04), but did not significantly improve the FEV1 (95% CI: -1.03 to 2.22, z = 0.72, P = 0.47) or increasing adverse events (RR 1.00, 95% CI: 0.91-1.10, z = 0.00, P = 1.00).Antiinterleukin 13 monoclonal therapies could be safely used to improve PEF, decrease FeNO and asthmatic exacerbation, and probably reduce rescue use of SABA, but could not decrease blood and sputum eosinophil levels, improve FEV1, inhibit methacholine PC20, or reduce ACQ scores.

Indexed as

AdultAnti-Asthmatic AgentsAntibodies, MonoclonalAsthmaHumansInterleukin-13Models, StatisticalTreatment OutcomeAnti-Asthmatic AgentsAntibodies, MonoclonalInterleukin-13

Identifiers

PMID26871775
PMCPMC4753870
OpenAlexW2294809597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.