Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26871689›Full record

SynthesisPLoS neglected tropical diseases2016

Epidemiology, Impact and Control of Rabies in Nepal: A Systematic Review.

Brecht Devleesschauwer, Arjun Aryal, Barun Kumar Sharma, Anita Ale, Anne Declercq, Stephanie Depraz, Tara Nath Gaire, Gyanendra Gongal, Surendra Karki, Basu Dev Pandey and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Rabies control in Nepal: a missed opportunity.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Modeling transmission dynamics of rabies in Nepal.Infectious Disease Modelling · 2021
    Article
  16. One-health approach: A best possible way to control rabies.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2020
    Review
  17. Review of rabies in Nepal.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2020
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 11 institutions in 6 countries.

Brecht DevleesschauwerDepartment of Virology, Parasitology and Immunology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Arjun AryalCentral Veterinary Hospital, Ministry of Agricultural Development, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Barun Kumar SharmaDepartment of Livestock Services, Ministry of Agricultural Development, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Anita AleNational Zoonoses and Food Hygiene Research Centre, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Anne DeclercqLaboratory of Experimental Hematology, Vaccine and Infectious Disease Institute (Vaxinfectio), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium.
Stephanie DeprazUnité Mixte de Recherche - Contrôle des Maladies Animales, Exotiques et Émergentes (UMR CMAEE), CIRAD, Petit-Bourg, Guadeloupe, France.
Tara Nath GaireDepartment of Livestock Services, Ministry of Agricultural Development, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Gyanendra GongalDisease Surveillance and Epidemiology, WHO Regional Office for South East Asia, New Delhi, India.
Surendra KarkiDepartment of Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Illinois, United States of America.
Basu Dev PandeyLeprosy Control Division, Department of Health Services, Ministry of Health and Population, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Sher Bahadur PunClinical Research Unit, Sukraraj Tropical & Infectious Disease Hospital, Teku, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Luc DuchateauDepartment of Comparative Physiology and Biometrics, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Pierre DornyDepartment of Virology, Parasitology and Immunology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Niko SpeybroeckInstitute of Health and Society (IRSS), Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Ministry of Health and Population · NPUCLouvain · BECentre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement · FRGhent University · BEInstituut voor Tropische Geneeskunde · BEMassey University · NZNational Zoonoses and Food Hygiene Research Centre · NPSukraraj Tropical & Infectious Disease Hospital · NPUniversity of Antwerp · BEUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USWorld Health Organization Regional Office for South-East Asia · IN

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRabies is a vaccine-preventable viral zoonosis belonging to the group of neglected tropical diseases. Exposure to a rabid animal may result in a fatal acute encephalitis if effective post-exposure prophylaxis is not provided. Rabies occurs worldwide, but its burden is disproportionately high in developing countries, including Nepal. We aimed to summarize current knowledge on the epidemiology, impact and control of rabies in Nepal.

methodsWe performed a systematic review of international and national scientific literature and searched grey literature through the World Health Organization Digital Library and the library of the National Zoonoses and Food Hygiene Research Centre, Nepal, and through searching Google and Google Scholar. Further data on animal and human rabies were obtained from the relevant Nepalese government agencies. Finally, we surveyed the archives of a Nepalese daily to obtain qualitative information on rabies in Nepal.

findingsSo far, only little original research has been conducted on the epidemiology and impact of rabies in Nepal. Per year, rabies is reported to kill about 100 livestock and 10-100 humans, while about 1,000 livestock and 35,000 humans are reported to receive rabies post-exposure prophylaxis. However, these estimates are very likely to be serious underestimations of the true rabies burden. Significant progress has been made in the production of cell culture-based anti-rabies vaccine and rabies immunoglobulin, but availability and supply remain a matter of concern, especially in remote areas. Different state and non-state actors have initiated rabies control activities over the years, but efforts typically remained focalized, of short duration and not harmonized. Communication and coordination between veterinary and human health authorities is limited at present, further complicating rabies control in Nepal. Important research gaps include the reporting biases for both human and animal rabies, the ecology of stray dog populations and the true contribution of the sylvatic cycle.

interpretationBetter data are needed to unravel the true burden of animal and human rabies. More collaboration, both within the country and within the region, is needed to control rabies. To achieve these goals, high level political commitment is essential. We therefore propose to make rabies the model zoonosis for successful control in Nepal.

Indexed as

AnimalsDog DiseasesDogsHumansNepalRabiesZoonoses

Identifiers

PMID26871689
PMCPMC4752342
OpenAlexW2254978315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.