Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26871541›Full record

GuidelineThe American journal of gastroenterology2016

Colonoscopy Surveillance after Colorectal Cancer Resection: Recommendations of the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.

Charles J Kahi, C Richard Boland, Jason A Dominitz, Francis M Giardiello, David A Johnson, Tonya Kaltenbach, David Lieberman, Theodore R Levin, Douglas J Robertson, Douglas K Rex

Abstract readPractice Guideline
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Guideline in The American journal of gastroenterology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Charles J KahiRichard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN.
C Richard BolandBaylor University Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, Texas.
Jason A DominitzVA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington.
Francis M GiardielloJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
David A JohnsonEastern VA Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia.
Tonya KaltenbachVeterans Affairs Palo Alto, Palo Alto, California.
David LiebermanOregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Theodore R LevinKaiser Permanente Medical Center, Walnut Creek, California.
Douglas J RobertsonVA Medical Center, White River Junction, Vermont.
Douglas K RexIndiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Baylor University Medical Center · USEastern Virginia Medical School · USIndiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USIndiana University School of MedicineJohns Hopkins Medicine · USKaiser Permanente Walnut Creek Medical Center · USOregon Health & Science University · USStanford University · USVA Puget Sound Health Care System · USWhite River Junction VA Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The US Multi-Society Task Force has developed updated recommendations to guide health care providers with the surveillance of patients after colorectal cancer (CRC) resection with curative intent. This document is based on a critical review of the literature regarding the role of colonoscopy, flexible sigmoidoscopy, endoscopic ultrasound, fecal testing and CT colonography in this setting. The document addresses the effect of surveillance, with focus on colonoscopy, on patient survival after CRC resection, the appropriate use and timing of colonoscopy for perioperative clearing and for postoperative prevention of metachronous CRC, specific considerations for the detection of local recurrence in the case of rectal cancer, as well as the place of CT colonography and fecal tests in post-CRC surveillance.

Indexed as

ColectomyColonNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasms, Second PrimaryColonography, Computed TomographicColorectal NeoplasmsEndosonographyFecesHumansImmunohistochemistryMonitoring, PhysiologicPostoperative PeriodSigmoidoscopy

Identifiers

PMID26871541
OpenAlexW2270245426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.