ReviewFrontiers in immunology2016
The Challenge and Potential of Metagenomics in the Clinic.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.
- Biotechnological Approaches to Probiotics and Postbiotics through the Gut-Brain Axis Modulation.Iranian biomedical journal · 2026Article
- The Contribution of the Human Oral Microbiome to Oral Disease: A Review.Microorganisms · 2023Review
- Antimicrobial Resistance Profile by Metagenomic and Metatranscriptomic Approach in Clinical Practice: Opportunity and Challenge.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Utilizing the VirIdAl Pipeline to Search for Viruses in the Metagenomic Data of Bat Samples.Viruses · 2021Article
- Emerging Options for the Diagnosis of Bacterial Infections and the Characterization of Antimicrobial Resistance.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Evaluation of Extraction Methods for Clinical Metagenomic Assay.Microorganisms · 2020Article
- Point-Counterpoint: Should We Be Performing Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing for Infectious Disease Diagnosis in the Clinical Laboratory?Journal of clinical microbiology · 2020Article
- Review
- Shotgun-Metagenomics on Positive Blood Culture Bottles Inoculated With Prosthetic Joint Tissue: A Proof of Concept Study.Frontiers in microbiology · 2020Article
- Streaming histogram sketching for rapid microbiome analytics.Microbiome · 2019Article
- A New Age in Molecular Diagnostics for Invasive Fungal Disease: Are We Ready?Frontiers in microbiology · 2019Review
- Recent advances in the treatment ofInfection and drug resistance · 2019Article
- Data mining analysis of human gut microbiota links Fusobacterium spp. with colorectal cancer onset.Bioinformation · 2019Article
- Unbiased Strain-Typing of Arbovirus Directly from Mosquitoes Using Nanopore Sequencing: A Field-forward Biosurveillance Protocol.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Highlighting Clinical Metagenomics for Enhanced Diagnostic Decision-making: A Step Towards Wider Implementation.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2018Review
- Identifying Corneal Infections in Formalin-Fixed Specimens Using Next Generation Sequencing.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2018Article
- Article
- Clinical and biological insights from viral genome sequencing.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2017Review
- Article
- Translational metagenomics and the human resistome: confronting the menace of the new millennium.Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany) · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The bacteria, fungi, and viruses that live on and in us have a tremendous impact on our day-to-day health and are often linked to many diseases, including autoimmune disorders and infections. Diagnosing and treating these disorders relies on accurate identification and characterization of the microbial community. Current sequencing technologies allow the sequencing of the entire nucleic acid complement of a sample providing an accurate snapshot of the community members present in addition to the full genetic potential of that microbial community. There are a number of clinical applications that stand to benefit from these data sets, such as the rapid identification of pathogens present in a sample. Other applications include the identification of antibiotic-resistance genes, diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal disorders, and many other diseases associated with bacterial, viral, and fungal microbiomes. Metagenomics also allows the physician to probe more complex phenotypes such as microbial dysbiosis with intestinal disorders and disruptions of the skin microbiome that may be associated with skin disorders. Many of these disorders are not associated with a single pathogen but emerge as a result of complex ecological interactions within microbiota. Currently, we understand very little about these complex phenotypes, yet clearly they are important and in some cases, as with fecal microbiota transplants in Clostridium difficile infections, treating the microbiome of the patient is effective. Here, we give an overview of metagenomics and discuss a number of areas where metagenomics is applicable in the clinic, and progress being made in these areas. This includes (1) the identification of unknown pathogens, and those pathogens particularly hard to culture, (2) utilizing functional information and gene content to understand complex infections such as Clostridium difficile, and (3) predicting antimicrobial resistance of the community using genetic determinants of resistance identified from the sequencing data. All of these applications rely on sophisticated computational tools, and we also discuss the importance of skilled bioinformatic support for the implementation and use of metagenomics in the clinic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.