Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26869988›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2016

Toward Precision Psychiatry: Statistical Platform for the Personalized Characterization of Natural Behaviors.

Elizabeth B Torres, Robert W Isenhower, Jillian Nguyen, Caroline Whyatt, John I Nurnberger, Jorge V Jose, Steven M Silverstein, Thomas V Papathomas, Jacob Sage, Jonathan Cole

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Machine Learning and Deep Learning for the Pharmacogenomics of Antidepressant Treatments.Clinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Aging with Autism Departs Greatly from Typical Aging.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Elizabeth B TorresPsychology Department, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA; Rutgers Center for Cognitive Science, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA; Computer Science Department, Center for Biomedical Imaging and Modeling, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Robert W IsenhowerPsychology Department, Rutgers University , New Brunswick, NJ , USA.
Jillian NguyenPsychology Department, Rutgers University , New Brunswick, NJ , USA.
Caroline WhyattPsychology Department, Rutgers University , New Brunswick, NJ , USA.
John I NurnbergerDepartment of Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatric Research, Indiana University School of Medicine , Indianapolis, IN , USA.
Jorge V JoseDepartment of Physics, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA; Department of Cellular and Integrative Physiology, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Steven M SilversteinDepartment of Psychiatry, Rutgers University Robert Wood Johnson Medical School , New Brunswick, NJ , USA.
Thomas V PapathomasRutgers Center for Cognitive Science, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Jacob SageMovement Disorders, Rutgers University Robert Wood Johnson Medical School , New Brunswick, NJ , USA.
Jonathan ColePoole Hospital and Bournemouth University , Poole , UK.
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USIndiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USJohnson University · USPoole Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a critical need for new analytics to personalize behavioral data analysis across different fields, including kinesiology, sports science, and behavioral neuroscience. Specifically, to better translate and integrate basic research into patient care, we need to radically transform the methods by which we describe and interpret movement data. Here, we show that hidden in the "noise," smoothed out by averaging movement kinematics data, lies a wealth of information that selectively differentiates neurological and mental disorders such as Parkinson's disease, deafferentation, autism spectrum disorders, and schizophrenia from typically developing and typically aging controls. In this report, we quantify the continuous forward-and-back pointing movements of participants from a large heterogeneous cohort comprising typical and pathological cases. We empirically estimate the statistical parameters of the probability distributions for each individual in the cohort and report the parameter ranges for each clinical group after characterization of healthy developing and aging groups. We coin this newly proposed platform for individualized behavioral analyses "precision phenotyping" to distinguish it from the type of observational-behavioral phenotyping prevalent in clinical studies or from the "one-size-fits-all" model in basic movement science. We further propose the use of this platform as a unifying statistical framework to characterize brain disorders of known etiology in relation to idiopathic neurological disorders with similar phenotypic manifestations.

Indexed as

autism spectrum disordersdeafferentationParkinson’s diseaseprecision phenotypingschizophreniasensory–motor noise

Identifiers

PMID26869988
PMCPMC4735831
OpenAlexW2270698363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.