Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26869940›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in physiology2016

Utility of a Novel Biofeedback Device for Within-Breath Modulation of Heart Rate in Rats: A Quantitative Comparison of Vagus Nerve vs. Right Atrial Pacing.

Erin L O'Callaghan, Ashok S Chauhan, Le Zhao, Renata M Lataro, Helio C Salgado, Alain Nogaret, Julian F R Paton

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Synchronization-Dissipation in the Cardiorespiratory System.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Optimal solid state neurons.Nature communications · 2019
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Erin L O'CallaghanSchool of Physiology, Pharmacology and Neuroscience, University of Bristol Bristol, UK.
Ashok S ChauhanDepartment of Physics, University of Bath Bath, UK.
Le ZhaoDepartment of Physics, University of Bath Bath, UK.
Renata M LataroSchool of Physiology, Pharmacology and Neuroscience, University of BristolBristol, UK; Department of Physiology, School of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto, University of São PauloSão Paulo, Brazil.
Helio C SalgadoDepartment of Physiology, School of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo São Paulo, Brazil.
Alain NogaretDepartment of Physics, University of Bath Bath, UK.
Julian F R PatonSchool of Physiology, Pharmacology and Neuroscience, University of Bristol Bristol, UK.
University of Bath · GBUniversidade de São Paulo · BRUniversity of Bristol · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation NH/14/1/30761British Heart Foundation PG/11/47/28980
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In an emerging bioelectronics era, there is a clinical need for physiological devices incorporating biofeedback that permits natural and demand-dependent control in real time. Here, we describe a novel device termed a central pattern generator (CPG) that uses cutting edge analog circuitry producing temporally controlled, electrical stimulus outputs based on the real time integration of physiological feedback. Motivated by the fact that respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA), which is the cyclical changes in heart rate every breath, is an essential component of heart rate variability (HRV) (an indicator of cardiac health), we have explored the versatility and efficiency of the CPG for producing respiratory modulation of heart rate in anesthetized, spontaneously breathing rats. Diaphragmatic electromyographic activity was used as the input to the device and its output connected to either the right cervical vagus nerve or the right atrium for pacing heart rate. We found that the CPG could induce respiratory related heart rate modulation that closely mimicked RSA. Whether connected to the vagus nerve or right atrium, the versatility of the device was demonstrated by permitting: (i) heart rate modulation in any phase of the respiratory cycle, (ii) control of the magnitude of heart rate modulation, and (iii) instant adaptation to changes in respiratory frequency. Vagal nerve pacing was only possible following transection of the nerve limiting its effective use chronically. Pacing via the right atrium permitted better flexibility and control of heart rate above its intrinsic level. This investigation now lays the foundation for future studies using this biofeedback technology permitting closer analysis of both the function and dysfunction of RSA.

Indexed as

cardiac pacingheart rate variabilitynovel biofeedback devicerespiratory sinus arrhythmiavagal nerve stimulation

Identifiers

PMID26869940
PMCPMC4740386
OpenAlexW2277479918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.