Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26869904›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in human neuroscience2016

The Interface between Neuroscience and Neuro-Psychoanalysis: Focus on Brain Connectivity.

Anatolia Salone, Alessandra Di Giacinto, Carlo Lai, Domenico De Berardis, Felice Iasevoli, Michele Fornaro, Luisa De Risio, Rita Santacroce, Giovanni Martinotti, Massimo Di Giannantonio

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Anatolia SaloneDepartment of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences and Institute for Advanced Biomedical Technologies-ITAB, University G. d'AnnunzioChieti-Pescara, Italy; Institute of Psychiatry, University G. d'AnnunzioChieti-Pescara, Italy.
Alessandra Di GiacintoDepartment of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences and Institute for Advanced Biomedical Technologies-ITAB, University G. d'AnnunzioChieti-Pescara, Italy; Institute of Psychiatry, University G. d'AnnunzioChieti-Pescara, Italy.
Carlo LaiDynamic and Clinical Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome Rome, Italy.
Domenico De BerardisInstitute of Psychiatry, University G. d'AnnunzioChieti-Pescara, Italy; National Health Service (NHS), Department of Mental Health, Psychiatric Service of Diagnosis and Treatment, Hospital "G. Mazzini"Teramo, Italy.
Felice IasevoliDepartment of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, Federico II University of Naples Naples, Italy.
Michele FornaroNew York State Psychiatric Institute (NYSPI), Columbia University New York, NY, USA.
Luisa De RisioDepartment of Neuroscience, Institute of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart Rome, Italy.
Rita SantacroceDepartment of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences and Institute for Advanced Biomedical Technologies-ITAB, University G. d'AnnunzioChieti-Pescara, Italy; Institute of Psychiatry, University G. d'AnnunzioChieti-Pescara, Italy.
Giovanni MartinottiDepartment of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences and Institute for Advanced Biomedical Technologies-ITAB, University G. d'AnnunzioChieti-Pescara, Italy; Institute of Psychiatry, University G. d'AnnunzioChieti-Pescara, Italy.
Massimo Di GiannantonioDepartment of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences and Institute for Advanced Biomedical Technologies-ITAB, University G. d'AnnunzioChieti-Pescara, Italy; Institute of Psychiatry, University G. d'AnnunzioChieti-Pescara, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past 20 years, the advent of advanced techniques has significantly enhanced our knowledge on the brain. Yet, our understanding of the physiological and pathological functioning of the mind is still far from being exhaustive. Both the localizationist and the reductionist neuroscientific approaches to psychiatric disorders have proven to be largely unsatisfactory and are outdated. Accruing evidence suggests that psychoanalysis can engage the neurosciences in a productive and mutually enriching dialogue that may further our understanding of psychiatric disorders. In particular, advances in brain connectivity research have provided evidence supporting the convergence of neuroscientific findings and psychoanalysis and helped characterize the circuitry and mechanisms that underlie higher brain functions. In the present paper we discuss how knowledge on brain connectivity can impact neuropsychoanalysis, with a particular focus on schizophrenia. Brain connectivity studies in schizophrenic patients indicate complex alterations in brain functioning and circuitry, with particular emphasis on the role of cortical midline structures (CMS) and the default mode network (DMN). These networks seem to represent neural correlates of psychodynamic concepts central to the understanding of schizophrenia and of core psychopathological alterations of this disorder (i.e., ego disturbances and impaired primary process thinking).

Indexed as

connectivityneuropsychoanalysisneuroscienceschizophreniaselfunconscious

Identifiers

PMID26869904
PMCPMC4737882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.