Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26869899›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2016

Resting-State Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Language Preoperative Planning.

Paulo Branco, Daniela Seixas, Sabine Deprez, Silvia Kovacs, Ronald Peeters, São L Castro, Stefan Sunaert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Evaluating the concordance of functional MRI-based language lateralization and Wada testing in epilepsy patients: A single-center analysis.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Paulo BrancoCenter for Psychology and Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Porto Porto, Portugal.
Daniela SeixasDepartment of Experimental Biology, Faculty of Medicine of Porto UniversityPorto, Portugal; Department of Imaging, Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia/EspinhoVila Nova de Gaia, Portugal.
Sabine DeprezTranslational MRI, Department of Imaging and Pathology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven - University of LeuvenLeuven, Belgium; Department of Radiology, University Hospitals LeuvenLeuven, Belgium; Medical Imaging Research Center, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven - University Hospitals LeuvenLeuven, Belgium.
Silvia KovacsTranslational MRI, Department of Imaging and Pathology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven - University of LeuvenLeuven, Belgium; Department of Radiology, University Hospitals LeuvenLeuven, Belgium; Medical Imaging Research Center, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven - University Hospitals LeuvenLeuven, Belgium.
Ronald PeetersTranslational MRI, Department of Imaging and Pathology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven - University of LeuvenLeuven, Belgium; Department of Radiology, University Hospitals LeuvenLeuven, Belgium; Medical Imaging Research Center, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven - University Hospitals LeuvenLeuven, Belgium.
São L CastroCenter for Psychology and Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Porto Porto, Portugal.
Stefan SunaertTranslational MRI, Department of Imaging and Pathology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven - University of LeuvenLeuven, Belgium; Department of Radiology, University Hospitals LeuvenLeuven, Belgium; Medical Imaging Research Center, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven - University Hospitals LeuvenLeuven, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is a well-known non-invasive technique for the study of brain function. One of its most common clinical applications is preoperative language mapping, essential for the preservation of function in neurosurgical patients. Typically, fMRI is used to track task-related activity, but poor task performance and movement artifacts can be critical limitations in clinical settings. Recent advances in resting-state protocols open new possibilities for pre-surgical mapping of language potentially overcoming these limitations. To test the feasibility of using resting-state fMRI instead of conventional active task-based protocols, we compared results from fifteen patients with brain lesions while performing a verb-to-noun generation task and while at rest. Task-activity was measured using a general linear model analysis and independent component analysis (ICA). Resting-state networks were extracted using ICA and further classified in two ways: manually by an expert and by using an automated template matching procedure. The results revealed that the automated classification procedure correctly identified language networks as compared to the expert manual classification. We found a good overlay between task-related activity and resting-state language maps, particularly within the language regions of interest. Furthermore, resting-state language maps were as sensitive as task-related maps, and had higher specificity. Our findings suggest that resting-state protocols may be suitable to map language networks in a quick and clinically efficient way.

Indexed as

fMRI language mappingfunctional MRIindependent component analysisneurosurgeryresting-state fMRI

Identifiers

PMID26869899
PMCPMC4740781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.