Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26869882›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cellular neuroscience2016

How to Properly Measure a Current-Voltage Relation?-Interpolation vs. Ramp Methods Applied to Studies of GABAA Receptors.

Tushar D Yelhekar, Michael Druzin, Urban Karlsson, Erii Blomqvist, Staffan Johansson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cellular neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Optogenetic Determination of Dynamic and Cell-Type-Specific Inhibitory Reversal Potentials.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Whole-GUV patch-clamping.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tushar D YelhekarSection for Physiology, Department of Integrative Medical Biology, Umeå University Umeå, Sweden.
Michael DruzinSection for Physiology, Department of Integrative Medical Biology, Umeå University Umeå, Sweden.
Urban KarlssonSection for Physiology, Department of Integrative Medical Biology, Umeå University Umeå, Sweden.
Erii BlomqvistSection for Physiology, Department of Integrative Medical Biology, Umeå University Umeå, Sweden.
Staffan JohanssonSection for Physiology, Department of Integrative Medical Biology, Umeå University Umeå, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The relation between current and voltage, I-V relation, is central to functional analysis of membrane ion channels. A commonly used method, since the introduction of the voltage-clamp technique, to establish the I-V relation depends on the interpolation of current amplitudes recorded at different steady voltages. By a theoretical computational approach as well as by experimental recordings from GABAA-receptor mediated currents in mammalian central neurons, we here show that this interpolation method may give reversal potentials and conductances that do not reflect the properties of the channels studied under conditions when ion flux may give rise to concentration changes. Therefore, changes in ion concentrations may remain undetected and conclusions on changes in conductance, such as during desensitization, may be mistaken. In contrast, an alternative experimental approach, using rapid voltage ramps, enable I-V relations that much better reflect the properties of the studied ion channels.

Indexed as

concentration changesconductancecurrent-voltage relationinterpolationion channelreversal potentialvoltage clampvoltage ramp

Identifiers

PMID26869882
PMCPMC4735409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.