Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26869619›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2016

Accuracy of Genomic Prediction in Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) Improved by Accounting for Linkage Disequilibrium.

Guillaume P Ramstein, Joseph Evans, Shawn M Kaeppler, Robert B Mitchell, Kenneth P Vogel, C Robin Buell, Michael D Casler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Guillaume P RamsteinDepartment of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin-Madison, WI 53706 ramstein@wisc.edu.
Joseph EvansDepartment of Energy Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824 Department of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824.
Shawn M KaepplerDepartment of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin-Madison, WI 53706 Department of Energy Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, WI 53706.
Robert B MitchellGrain, Forage, and Bioenergy Research Unit, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583-0937.
Kenneth P VogelGrain, Forage, and Bioenergy Research Unit, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583-0937.
C Robin BuellDepartment of Energy Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824 Department of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824.
Michael D CaslerDepartment of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin-Madison, WI 53706 Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Madison, WI 53706.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Switchgrass is a relatively high-yielding and environmentally sustainable biomass crop, but further genetic gains in biomass yield must be achieved to make it an economically viable bioenergy feedstock. Genomic selection (GS) is an attractive technology to generate rapid genetic gains in switchgrass, and meet the goals of a substantial displacement of petroleum use with biofuels in the near future. In this study, we empirically assessed prediction procedures for genomic selection in two different populations, consisting of 137 and 110 half-sib families of switchgrass, tested in two locations in the United States for three agronomic traits: dry matter yield, plant height, and heading date. Marker data were produced for the families' parents by exome capture sequencing, generating up to 141,030 polymorphic markers with available genomic-location and annotation information. We evaluated prediction procedures that varied not only by learning schemes and prediction models, but also by the way the data were preprocessed to account for redundancy in marker information. More complex genomic prediction procedures were generally not significantly more accurate than the simplest procedure, likely due to limited population sizes. Nevertheless, a highly significant gain in prediction accuracy was achieved by transforming the marker data through a marker correlation matrix. Our results suggest that marker-data transformations and, more generally, the account of linkage disequilibrium among markers, offer valuable opportunities for improving prediction procedures in GS. Some of the achieved prediction accuracies should motivate implementation of GS in switchgrass breeding programs.

Indexed as

Genetic LinkageGenome, PlantGenomicsLinkage DisequilibriumAlgorithmsAllelesGene FrequencyGenetic VariationModels, GeneticPanicumPhenotypeQuantitative Trait, HeritableReproducibility of Resultsbioenergyexome capturegenomic selectionGenPredlinkage disequilibriumPanicum virgatum LShared data resource

Identifiers

PMID26869619
PMCPMC4825640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.