Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26869430›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical sciences2016

Comparison of Linear and Cyclic His-Ala-Val Peptides in Modulating the Blood-Brain Barrier Permeability: Impact on Delivery of Molecules to the Brain.

Ahmed Alaofi, Ngoc On, Paul Kiptoo, Todd D Williams, Donald W Miller, Teruna J Siahaan

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmaceutical sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Molecular pharmaceutics · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ahmed AlaofiDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66047.
Ngoc OnDepartment of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Paul KiptooDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66047.
Todd D WilliamsMass Spectrometry Laboratory, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66047.
Donald W MillerDepartment of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Teruna J SiahaanDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66047. Electronic address: siahaan@ku.edu.
University of Kansas · USUniversity of Manitoba · CA

Funding

PHARMACEUTICAL ASPECTS OF BIOTECHNOLOGY TRAININGT32GM008359 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS LAWRENCE · PI SIAHAAN, TERUNA J., VOLKIN, DAVID · 1989 to 2018
$5.0M
Modulating the BBB to Improve Drug Delivery to the BrainR01NS075374 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS LAWRENCE · PI SIAHAAN, TERUNA J. · 2011 to 2015
$1.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008359NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS075374NINDS NIH HHS R01-NS075374
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of peptide cyclization on the blood-brain barrier (BBB) modulatory activity and plasma stability of His-Ala-Val peptides, which are derived from the extracellular 1 domain of human E-cadherin. The activities to modulate the intercellular junctions by linear HAV4 (Ac-SHAVAS-NH2), cyclic cHAVc1 (Cyclo(1,8)Ac-CSHAVASC-NH2), and cyclic cHAVc3 (Cyclo(1,6)Ac-CSHAVC-NH2) were compared in in vitro and in vivo BBB models. Linear HAV4 and cyclic cHAVc1 have the same junction modulatory activities as assessed by in vitro MDCK monolayer model and in situ rat brain perfusion model. In contrast, cyclic cHAVc3 was more effective than linear HAV4 in modulating MDCK cell monolayers and in improving in vivo brain delivery of Gd-DTPA on i.v. administration in Balb/c mice. Cyclic cHAVc3 (t1/2 = 12.95 h) has better plasma stability compared with linear HAV4 (t1/2 = 2.4 h). The duration of the BBB modulation was longer using cHAVc3 (2-4 h) compared with HAV4 (<1 h). Both HAV4 and cHAVc3 peptides also enhanced the in vivo brain delivery of IRdye800cw-PEG (25 kDa) as detected by near IR imaging. The result showed that cyclic cHAVc3 peptide had better activity and plasma stability than linear HAV4 peptide.

Indexed as

AnimalsBlood-Brain BarrierBrainDipeptidesDogsDrug Delivery SystemsHumansMadin Darby Canine Kidney CellsMiceMice, Inbred BALB CPeptides, CyclicPermeabilityRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyValineDipeptideshistidinoalaninePeptides, CyclicValineadherens junctionBBBBBB modulationblood-brain barrierbrain deliverycadherin peptidesHAV peptideparacellular pathwaytight junction

Identifiers

PMID26869430
PMCPMC4756412
OpenAlexW2280904264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.