Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26869135›Full record

ArticleJAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery2016

Association of Compliance With Process-Related Quality Metrics and Improved Survival in Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Evan M Graboyes, Jennifer Gross, Dorina Kallogjeri, Jay F Piccirillo, Maha Al-Gilani, Michael E Stadler, Brian Nussenbaum

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Factors Associated with Head and Neck Cancer Postoperative Radiotherapy Delays: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Textbook Outcome After Oral Cancer Surgery as a Composite Measure for Survival and Quality-of-Care Evaluation.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Opportunistic pathogeniScience · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Head and neck cancers: Monitoring quality and reporting outcomes.Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Performance Improvement in Head and Neck Cancer.Current oncology reports · 2018
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Evan M GraboyesDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
Jennifer GrossDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
Dorina KallogjeriDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
Jay F PiccirilloDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri2Editor, JAMA Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery.
Maha Al-GilaniDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
Michael E StadlerDepartment of Otolaryngology and Communication Sciences, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.
Brian NussenbaumDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
Washington University in St. Louis · USMedical College of Wisconsin · US

Funding

Translational Science Laboratory Shared ResourceP30CA138313 · NCI · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI Jian Ouyang · 2009 to 2026
$42.7M
Sensory Function CoreP30DC004665 · NIDCD · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI OHLEMILLER, KEVIN K. · 2001 to 2015
$8.0M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA138313NIDCD NIH HHS P30 DC004665
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceQuality metrics for patients with head and neck cancer are available, but it is unknown whether compliance with these metrics is associated with improved patient survival.

objectiveTo identify whether compliance with various process-related quality metrics is associated with improved survival in patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma who receive definitive surgery with or without adjuvant therapy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsA retrospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary academic medical center among 192 patients with previously untreated oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma who underwent definitive surgery with or without adjuvant therapy between January 1, 2003, and December 31, 2010. Data analysis was performed from January 26 to August 7, 2015.

interventionsSurgery with or without adjuvant therapy. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Compliance with a collection of process-related quality metrics possessing face validity that covered pretreatment evaluation, treatment, and posttreatment surveillance was evaluated. Association between compliance with these quality metrics and overall survival, disease-specific survival, and disease-free survival was calculated using univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis.

resultsAmong 192 patients, compliance with the individual quality metrics ranged from 19.7% to 93.6% (median, 82.8%). No pretreatment or surveillance metrics were associated with improved survival. Compliance with the following treatment-related quality metrics was associated with improved survival: elective neck dissection with lymph node yield of 18 or more, no unplanned surgery within 14 days of the index surgery, no unplanned 30-day readmissions, and referral for adjuvant radiotherapy for pathologic stage III or IV disease. Increased compliance with a "clinical care signature" composed of these 4 metrics was associated with improved overall survival, disease-specific survival, and disease-free survival on univariable analysis (log-rank test; P < .05 for each). On multivariable analysis controlling for pT stage, pN stage, extracapsular spread, margin status, and comorbidity, increased compliance with these 4 metrics was associated with improved overall survival (100% vs ≤50% compliance: adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 4.2; 95% CI, 2.1-8.5; 100% vs 51%-99% compliance: aHR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.0-3.1), improved disease-specific survival (100% vs ≤50% compliance: aHR, 3.9; 95% CI, 1.7-9.0; 100% vs 51%-99%: aHR, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.6-2.9), and improved disease-free survival (100% vs ≤50% compliance: aHR, 3.0; 95% CI, 1.5-5.8; 100% vs 51%-99% compliance: aHR, 1.6; 95% CI, 0.9-2.7). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Compliance with a core set of process-related quality metrics was associated with improved survival for patients with surgically managed oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma. Multi-institutional validation of these metrics is warranted.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Squamous CellCohort StudiesDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMouth NeoplasmsNeck DissectionOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CarePatient ReadmissionQuality Assurance, Health CareRadiotherapy, AdjuvantRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID26869135
PMCPMC6086583
OpenAlexW2270385708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.