Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26869076›Full record

Trial reportTrials2016

Investigating the feasibility and acceptability of a cognitive behavioural suicide prevention therapy for people in acute psychiatric wards (the 'INSITE' trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Gillian Haddock, Linda Davies, Emma Evans, Richard Emsley, Patricia Gooding, Lisa Heaney, Sarah Jones, James Kelly, Ailsa Munro, Sarah Peters and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Psychosocial interventions for self-harm in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Psychological therapies for people with borderline personality disorder.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Staff experiences and perceptions of working with in-patients who are suicidal: qualitative analysis.The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science · 2017
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Gillian HaddockSchool of Psychological Sciences, Manchester University, Zochonis Building, Brunswick Street, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK. gillian.haddock@manchester.ac.uk.
Linda DaviesCentre for Health Economics, Institute of Population Health, Manchester University, Jean McFarlane Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK. linda.davies@manchester.ac.uk.
Emma EvansSchool of Psychological Sciences, Manchester University, Zochonis Building, Brunswick Street, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK. emma.evans@manchester.ac.uk.
Richard EmsleyCentre for Biostatistics, Institute of Population Health, Manchester University, 1.304 Jean McFarlane Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK. richard.emsley@manchester.ac.uk.
Patricia GoodingSchool of Psychological Sciences, Manchester University, Coupland Building 1, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK. patricia.a.gooding@manchester.ac.uk.
Lisa HeaneySchool of Psychological Sciences, Manchester University, Zochonis Building, Brunswick Street, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK. lisa.heaney@manchester.ac.uk.
Sarah JonesSchool of Psychological Sciences, Manchester University, Zochonis Building, Brunswick Street, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK. sarah.jones-5@manchester.ac.uk.
James KellyLancashire Care NHS Foundation Trust, Early Intervention Service, Accrington, UK. james.kelly@lancashirecare.nhs.uk.
Ailsa MunroSchool of Psychological Sciences, Manchester University, Zochonis Building, Brunswick Street, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK. ailsa.munro@manchester.ac.uk.
Sarah PetersSchool of Psychological Sciences, Manchester University, Zochonis Building, Brunswick Street, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK. sarah.peters@manchester.ac.uk.
Daniel PrattSchool of Psychological Sciences, Manchester University, Zochonis Building, Brunswick Street, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK. daniel.pratt@manchester.ac.uk.
Nicholas TarrierSchool of Psychological Sciences, Manchester University, Zochonis Building, Brunswick Street, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK. nicholas.tarrier@manchester.ac.uk.
Kirsten WindfuhrNational Confidential Inquiry into Suicide and Homicide by People with Mental Illness, Centre for Mental Health and Safety, Manchester University, 2nd Floor, Jean McFarlane Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK. kirsten.windfuhr@manchester.ac.uk.
Yvonne AwenatSchool of Psychological Sciences, Manchester University, Zochonis Building, Brunswick Street, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK. yvonne.awenat@manchester.ac.uk.
University of Manchester · GBCentre for Mental Health · GBLancashire Care NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Department of Health PB-PG-1111-26026
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSuicide is a major cause of preventable death, and suicidal behaviour is prevalent in acute psychiatric wards. People admitted to acute psychiatric wards often experience repeated episodes of suicidal behaviour, causing great distress and heavy use of NHS services. There is little research investigating effective psychological treatments for suicidal patients in inpatient settings although previous research has found support for psychological therapies which specifically target suicidal behaviour. This paper describes the protocol of a single blind RCT to investigate the acceptability and feasibility of a cognitive behavioural intervention targeting suicidality (CBSP) for suicidal people in acute psychiatric wards. METHODS/

designA single blind RCT comparing treatment as usual (TAU) to TAU plus Cognitive Behavioural Suicide Prevention (CBSP) therapy (TAU + CBSP). Sixty participants (aged 18-65 years) who are suicidal, or have been within the past 3 months, will be recruited from NHS trusts in the North West of England. Our primary objective is to determine whether CBSP is feasible, acceptable and efficacious when compared to patients who receive TAU alone. Secondary aims are the impact of CBSP on suicidal thinking, behaviours, functioning, quality of life, service use and psychological factors associated with suicide. Assessments take place at baseline, 6 weeks and 6 months (end of treatment). The analysis will report on the feasibility and acceptability of CBSP. Qualitative data from staff and service users will inform feasibility and acceptability data. DISCUSSION: Psychiatric inpatients are a high-risk group and the use of psychological therapies in these settings is rare and requires evaluation. This study is essential to investigate the unique contextual challenges involved in delivering psychological therapy to suicidal inpatients and to identify any necessary modifications required within inpatient settings. The findings will inform a larger, definitive trial.

trial registration15 March 2012, PB-PG-1111-26026, NIHR ISRCTN17890126 .

Indexed as

Clinical ProtocolsPatient Acceptance of Health CareSuicide PreventionAcute DiseaseAdolescentAdultAgedCognitive Behavioral TherapyData Interpretation, StatisticalHumansMental DisordersMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CarePatient SelectionSingle-Blind Method

Identifiers

PMID26869076
PMCPMC4751630
OpenAlexW2289726796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.