Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26869058›Full record

SynthesisSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)2016

Compliance with Sport Injury Prevention Interventions in Randomised Controlled Trials: A Systematic Review.

Miriam van Reijen, Ingrid Vriend, Willem van Mechelen, Caroline F Finch, Evert A Verhagen

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04284358 (Comparison of Workshop Delivery Methods on Youth Soccer Coaches' Ability to and Self-efficacy in Identifying Exercise Errors of a Soccer Neuromuscular Training Warm-up), which is not on this map. Cited by 30 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04284358 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Workshop Delivery Methods on Youth Soccer Coaches' Ability to and Self-efficacy in Identifying Exercise Errors of a Soccer Neuromuscular Training Warm-up

TypeinterventionalSponsorSport Injury Prevention Research CentreRan2019 to 2019Enrolled85ConditionsSport InjuryArmsTechnology integrated instruction neuromuscular training warm-up workshop
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Miriam van ReijenDepartment of Public & Occupational Health, EMGO+ Institute, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ingrid VriendDepartment of Public & Occupational Health, EMGO+ Institute, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Willem van MechelenDepartment of Public & Occupational Health, EMGO+ Institute, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Caroline F FinchAustralian Centre for Research into Injury in Sport and its Prevention (ACRISP), Federation University Australia, Ballarat, VIC, Australia.
Evert A VerhagenDepartment of Public & Occupational Health, EMGO+ Institute, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. e.verhagen@vumc.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSport injury prevention studies vary in the way compliance with an intervention is defined, measured and adjusted for.

objectiveThe objective of this systematic review was to assess the extent to which sport injury prevention randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have defined, measured and adjusted results for compliance with an injury prevention intervention.

methodsAn electronic search was performed in MEDLINE, PubMed, the Cochrane Center of Controlled Trials, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), PEDro (Physiotherapy Evidence Database) and SPORTDiscus. English RCTs, quasi-RCTs and cluster-RCTs were considered eligible. Trials that involved physically active individuals or examined the effects of an intervention aimed at the prevention of sport- or physical activity-related injuries were included.

resultsOf the total of 100 studies included, 71.6 % mentioned compliance or a related term, 68.8 % provided details on compliance measurement and 51.4 % provided compliance data. Only 19.3 % analysed the effect of compliance rates on study outcomes. While studies used heterogeneous methods, pooled effects could not be presented.

conclusionsStudies that account for compliance demonstrated that compliance significant affects study outcomes. The way compliance is dealt with in preventions studies is subject to a large degree of heterogeneity. Valid and reliable tools to measure and report compliance are needed and should be matched to a uniform definition of compliance.

Indexed as

Patient ComplianceRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAthletic InjuriesHumansSemantics

Identifiers

PMID26869058
PMCPMC4963451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.