Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26869025›Full record

ArticleExperimental & molecular medicine2016

Differentiation of human gingival mesenchymal stem cells into neuronal lineages in 3D bioconjugated injectable protein hydrogel construct for the management of neuronal disorder.

Suresh Ranga Rao, Rajasekaran Subbarayan, Murugan Girija Dinesh, Gnanamani Arumugam, Selvaraj Thirupathi Kumara Raja

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental & molecular medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Minimally Invasive and Regenerative Therapeutics.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2019
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Suresh Ranga RaoDepartment of Periodontology and Implantology, Faculty of Dental Sciences, Centre for Regenerative Medicine and Stem Cell Research, Sri Ramachandra University, Chennai, India.
Rajasekaran SubbarayanCentre for Regenerative Medicine and Stem Cell Research, Central Research Facility, Sri Ramachandra University, Chennai, India.
Murugan Girija DineshCentres for Indian Systems of Medicine Quality Assurance and Standardization, Sri Ramachandra University, Chennai, India.
Gnanamani ArumugamMicrobiology Division, Central Leather Research Institute Adyar, Chennai, India.
Selvaraj Thirupathi Kumara RajaMicrobiology Division, Central Leather Research Institute Adyar, Chennai, India.
Central Leather Research Institute · INSri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The success of regeneration attempt is based on an ideal combination of stem cells, scaffolding and growth factors. Tissue constructs help to maintain stem cells in a required area for a desired time. There is a need for easily obtainable cells, potentially autologous stem cells and a biologically acceptable scaffold for use in humans in different difficult situations. This study aims to address these issues utilizing a unique combination of stem cells from gingiva and a hydrogel scaffold, based on a natural product for regenerative application. Human gingival mesenchymal stem cells (HGMSCs) were, with due induction, differentiated to neuronal lineages to overcome the problems associated with birth tissue-related stem cells. The differentiation potential of neuronal lineages was confirmed with suitable specific markers. The properties of mesenchymal stem cells in encapsulated form were observed to be similar to free cells. The encapsulated cells (3D) were then subjected to differentiation into neuronal lineages with suitable inducers, and the morphology and gene expression of transient cells were analyzed. HGMSCs was differentiated into neuronal lineages as both free and encapsulated forms without any significant differences. The presence of Nissl bodies and the neurite outgrowth confirm the differentiation. The advantages of this new combination appear to make it a promising tissue construct for translational application.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationRegenerationAdultBiomarkersCell Culture TechniquesGingivaHumansHydrogel, Polyethylene Glycol DimethacrylateMesenchymal Stem CellsNeuronsPhenotypeTissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsYoung AdultBiomarkersHydrogel, Polyethylene Glycol Dimethacrylate

Identifiers

PMID26869025
PMCPMC4892868
OpenAlexW2261205745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.