Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26868682›Full record

ReviewJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2016

Are you a cancer survivor? A review on cancer identity.

Sze Yan Cheung, Paul Delfabbro

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05871996 (What do Individuals Known to Palliative Care and Oncology Services Think About the Terminology Used to Describe Them?), which is not on this map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
12.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05871996 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

What do Individuals Known to Palliative Care and Oncology Services Think About the Terminology Used to Describe Them?

TypeobservationalSponsorOur Lady's Hospice and Care ServicesRan2023 to 2025Enrolled1,532ConditionsCancerArmsPalliative Care and Oncology Survey on Terminology (POST)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. e-Delphi study on European expert views about "cancer survivor" and related terminologies.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Behind the label: a qualitative study of the self-perceptions of individuals with advanced lung cancer receiving immunotherapy or targeted therapy.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  13. The role of specialist palliative care in individuals "living beyond cancer": a narrative review of the literature.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Understanding colorectal cancer patient follow-up: a qualitative interview study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sze Yan CheungSchool of Psychology, University of Adelaide, Level 4 Hughes Building, Adelaide, SA, 5005, Australia. szeyan.cheung@adelaide.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0001-5331-6322
Paul DelfabbroSchool of Psychology, University of Adelaide, Level 4 Hughes Building, Adelaide, SA, 5005, Australia.
The University of Adelaide · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIndividuals diagnosed with cancer have been shown to interpret the term "cancer survivor" differently and this may have implications for how they cope with their illness. This article reviews the empirical research conducted in the field and aims to formulate recommendations for future research.

methodsA literature search was conducted on PubMed, PsycInfo, Embase and CINAHL using search strategies customized for each database: standardized subject terms and a wide range of free-text terms for "cancer", "survivor", and "identity". Data from 23 eligible papers were extracted and summarized.

resultsAnalysis of the studies revealed that individuals diagnosed with cancer could be categorized into five groups based on their attitudes towards being a cancer survivor: embracing, constructive, ambiguous, resisting and non-salient. Identification as "cancer survivor" was found to be highly prevalent within the breast cancer community (77.9 %) and least among individuals diagnosed with prostate cancer (30.6 %). Self-identifying as a cancer survivor was related to better quality of life and mental wellbeing, with those having a childhood diagnosis more likely to transition successfully into adult care.

conclusionsThe findings show that, for a substantial group of individuals, "cancer survivor" is not a title earned upon receiving a cancer diagnosis or completion of treatment, but an identity that may be embraced in time after deliberation. Future studies should examine the endorsement rate in less common cancers and whether choice of cancer identity varies over time. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Researchers and healthcare professionals should use caution when using the term "cancer survivor" so as not to alienate anyone who has been diagnosed with cancer but does not identify with it.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleHumansMaleNeoplasmsQuality of LifeSurvivorsCancer identityCancer survivorCancer survivorshipQuality of life

Identifiers

PMID26868682
OpenAlexW2268718617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.