Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26868367›Full record

ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2016

Not the End of the Odyssey: Parental Perceptions of Whole Exome Sequencing (WES) in Pediatric Undiagnosed Disorders.

Allyn McConkie Rosell, Loren D M Pena, Kelly Schoch, Rebecca Spillmann, Jennifer Sullivan, Stephen R Hooper, Yong-Hui Jiang, Nicolas Mathey-Andrews, David B Goldstein, Vandana Shashi

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
11.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 127 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The value of large-scale programmes in human genomics.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Allyn McConkie RosellDivision of Medical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Box 103757, Durham, NC, 27710, USA. allyn.mcconkie@duke.edu.
Loren D M PenaDivision of Medical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Box 103757, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Kelly SchochDivision of Medical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Box 103757, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Rebecca SpillmannDivision of Medical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Box 103757, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Jennifer SullivanDivision of Medical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Box 103757, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Stephen R HooperDepartment of Allied Health, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Yong-Hui JiangDivision of Medical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Box 103757, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Nicolas Mathey-AndrewsDivision of Medical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Box 103757, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
David B GoldsteinInstitute for Genomic Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Vandana ShashiDivision of Medical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Box 103757, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Duke Medical Center · USColumbia University Irving Medical Center · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

An integrated and diverse genomic medicine program for undiagnosed diseasesU01HG007672 · NHGRI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI SHASHI, VANDANA · 2014 to 2022
$13.4M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to the lack of empirical information on parental perceptions of primary results of whole exome sequencing (WES), we conducted a retrospective semi-structured interview with 19 parents of children who had undergone WES. Perceptions explored during the interview included factors that would contribute to parental empowerment such as: parental expectations, understanding of the WES and results, utilization of the WES information, and communication of findings to health/educational professionals and family members. Results of the WES had previously been communicated to families within a novel framework of clinical diagnostic categories: 5/19 had Definite diagnoses, 6/19 had Likely diagnoses, 3/19 had Possible diagnosis and 5/19 had No diagnosis. All parents interviewed expressed a sense of duty to pursue the WES in search of a diagnosis; however, their expectations were tempered by previous experiences with negative genetic testing results. Approximately half the parents worried that a primary diagnosis that would be lethal might be identified; however, the hope of a diagnosis outweighed this concern. Parents were accurately able to summarize their child's WES findings, understood the implications for recurrence risks, and were able to communicate these findings to family and medical/educational providers. The majority of those with a Definite/Likely diagnosis felt that their child's medical care was more focused, or there was a reduction in worry, despite the lack of a specific treatment. Irrespective of diagnostic outcome, parents recommended that follow-up visits be built into the process. Several parents expressed a desire to have all variants of unknown significance (VUS) reported to them so that they could investigate these themselves. Finally, for some families whose children had a Definite/Likely diagnosis, there was remaining frustration and a sense of isolation, due to the limited information that was available about the diagnosed rare disorders and the inability to connect to other families, suggesting that for families with rare genetic disorders, the diagnostic odyssey does not necessarily end with a diagnosis. Qualitative interviewing served a meaningful role in eliciting new information about parental motivations, expectations, and knowledge of WES. Our findings highlight a need for continued communication with families as we navigate the new landscape of genomic sequencing.

Indexed as

DisclosurePediatricsSequence AnalysisAdultCommunicationExomeFemaleGenetic Diseases, InbornGenetic TestingHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotivationParentsRare DiseasesRetrospective StudiesEmpowermentGenetic counselingParental perspectivesWhole exome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID26868367
OpenAlexW2286007596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.