Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26868121›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2016

Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 2015 end of year summary: cardiovascular and hemodynamic monitoring.

Karim Bendjelid, Steffen Rex, Thomas Scheeren, Bernd Saugel

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Karim BendjelidDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Service, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland. karim.bendjelid@hcuge.ch.
Steffen RexDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Thomas ScheerenDepartment of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Bernd SaugelDepartment of Anesthesiology, Centre of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
KU Leuven · BEUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversity Hospital of Geneva · CHUniversity of Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hemodynamic monitoring is essential in critically ill patients. In this regard, the Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing (JCMC) has become an ideal platform for publishing cardiovascular and hemodynamic monitoring-related research, as reflected by an increasing number of articles related to this topic and published in the recent years. To highlight this new progress, every New Year the journal prints a descriptive review on some important papers published last year in the JCMC and related to blood, cardiovascular function and hemodynamic monitoring.

Indexed as

AnimalsDiagnostic Techniques, CardiovascularEchocardiographyHemodynamicsHumansIndicator Dilution TechniquesMonitoring, PhysiologicPeriodicals as TopicBlood circulationCardiac outputMonitoringNon-invasive

Identifiers

PMID26868121
OpenAlexW2261799066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.