Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26867805›Full record

ArticleAge (Dordrecht, Netherlands)2016

Clinically relevant weakness in diverse populations of older adults participating in the International Mobility in Aging Study.

Juliana Fernandes de Souza Barbosa, Mario Ulises Perez Zepeda, François Béland, Jack M Guralnik, Maria Victoria Zunzunegui, Ricardo Oliveira Guerra

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Age (Dordrecht, Netherlands), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The healthy aging phenotype in older people in ManizalesBiomedica : revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud · 2020
    Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Cohort Profile: The International Mobility In Aging Study (IMIAS).International journal of epidemiology · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Juliana Fernandes de Souza BarbosaDepartment of Physiotherapy, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil. julianaferso@gmail.com.
Mario Ulises Perez ZepedaInstituto Nacional de Geriatría, Mexico City, Distrito Federal, Mexico.
François BélandDepartament of Health Administration, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
Jack M GuralnikDepartament of Epidemiology and Public Health, Division of Gerontology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Maria Victoria ZunzuneguiCentre de Recherché du Centre Hospitalière de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada.
Ricardo Oliveira GuerraDepartment of Physiotherapy, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aims of this study were to compare cut points for weakness proposed by Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (FNIH) Sarcopenia Project with cut points estimated with our own data; to assess the prevalence of clinically relevant handgrip strength (HGS) weakness according to published criteria across distinct populations of older adults; to estimate the ability of HGS weakness to identify slowness. This is a cross-sectional analysis of International Mobility in Aging Study (IMIAS) involving 1935 community-dwelling older adults, between 65 and 74 years, who completed HGS and gait speed assessment. We used baseline data from Tirana (Albania), Natal (Brazil), Manizales (Colombia), Kingston (Ontario, Canada), and Saint-Hyacinthe (Quebec, Canada). Weakness was defined according to sex-specific HGS cut points associated with slowness proposed by FNIH Sarcopenia Project. Slowness was defined as gait speed <0.8 m/s. IMIAS cut points for clinical weakness had good agreement with those proposed by FNIH. Weakness prevalence across the research sites ranged from 1.1 % (Saint-Hyacinthe) to 19.2 % (Manizales) among men. Women from Manizales (13.5 %) and Natal (19.3 %) had higher prevalence of weakness than their counterparts. FNIH cut points had a strong association with slowness, for both sexes. The IMIAS population generated cut points which were close to those proposed by FNIH. There was large variability in prevalence of weakness across our research sites. The HGS cut points for weakness proposed by FNIH performed well in IMIAS populations, providing a useful tool for screening older adults at risk for functional problems.

Indexed as

AgedAgingBrazilCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGaitHand StrengthHumansMaleOntarioPrevalenceProspective StudiesSarcopeniaSex FactorsTime FactorsAgingHandgrip strengthMobility limitationSarcopenia

Identifiers

PMID26867805
PMCPMC5005882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.