ArticleTumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine2016
Exosomal miRNAs as biomarkers of recurrent lung cancer.
Article in Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
66 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The accuracy of microRNA-210 in diagnosing lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Oncotarget · 2016Pooled it
- Extracellular Vesicles as a Potential Tool in Cancer Diagnosis and Therapy.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Exosomal biomarkers and therapeutics in lung cancer: a narrative review on their role in early detection and targeted treatment.Translational lung cancer research · 2025Review
- Transforming Cancer Diagnostics: The Emergence of Liquid Biopsy and Epigenetic Markers.MedComm · 2025Review
- Near-infrared long lifetime upconversion nanoparticles for ultrasensitive microRNA detection via time-gated luminescence resonance energy transfer.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Relationship between exosomes and cancer: formation, diagnosis, and treatment.International journal of biological sciences · 2025Review
- Targeting cancer via macrophage-derived exosomal miRNAs: implications for tumor progression and resistance.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Exosomal microRNAs in lung cancer: a narrative review.Translational cancer research · 2024Review
- Plasmonic nano-aperture label-free imaging of single small extracellular vesicles for cancer detection.Communications medicine · 2024Article
- Lung cancer cell-derived exosomes: progress on pivotal role and its application in diagnostic and therapeutic potential.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Review
- Applications of Exosome Vesicles in Different Cancer Types as Biomarkers.Current molecular medicine · 2024Review
- Prognostic Factors and Markers in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Recent Progress and Future Challenges.Genes · 2023Review
- Production and Utility of Extracellular Vesicles with 3D Culture Methods.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- Role of exosomes in non-small cell lung cancer and EGFR-mutated lung cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Review
- The Implication of Liquid Biopsy in the Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Potential and Expectation.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023Review
- Exosome-Encapsulated miR-31, miR-192, and miR-375 Serve as Clinical Biomarkers of Gastric Cancer.Journal of oncology · 2023Article
- Tumor-derived exosomal non-coding RNAs as diagnostic biomarkers in cancer.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2022Review
- MiRNAs in Lung Cancer: Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Therapeutic Potential.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Molecular functions and therapeutic applications of exosomal noncoding RNAs in cancer.Experimental & molecular medicine · 2022Review
- The role of Exosomal miRNAs in cancer.Journal of translational medicine · 2022Review
6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prognosis of lung cancer still remains grim largely due to recurrence and aggressive metastasis of the disease. In this study, we examined the potential of exosomal miRNAs as biomarkers of recurrent lung cancer. Initially, in vitro miRNA profiles of normal lung (Beas-2b) and lung cancer (H1299) cells and of exosomes isolated from conditioned media were determined. In vivo study involved establishing subcutaneous primary and recurrent lung cancer xenografts in nude mouse model and examining tumor and serum exosomal miRNA alteration in secondary/recurrent lung tumors. A total of 77 miRNAs were observed to be significantly modulated in the H1299 cells (47 miRNA upregulated and 30 downregulated) compared to the Beas-2b cells. The exosomes isolated from conditioned media indicated several miRNAs which were in agreement with cells of origin. A similarity was also observed between miRNAs from serum exosomes and tumors, indicating their origin from the lung tumors. Two miRNAs, miR-21 and miR-155, were found to be significantly upregulated in recurrent tumors compared to primary tumors. These miRNAs were also upregulated in serum exosomes of recurrent tumor-bearing animals versus non-tumor- or primary tumor-bearing animals. Increased expression of the recurrent disease markers were also observed in recurrent tumors compared with primary tumors. Serum exosomes from recurrent tumor mice mirrored its tumor profile in expressing higher levels of these proteins compared with exosomes from primary tumor mice. Our data suggest that exosomal miRNA signatures may be a true representation of a pathological profile of lung cancer; thus, miRNAs could serve as promising biomarkers for non-invasive diagnosis of the disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26867772What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.