Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26867710›Full record

ArticleJAMA oncology2016

BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Testing in Young Women With Breast Cancer.

Shoshana M Rosenberg, Kathryn J Ruddy, Rulla M Tamimi, Shari Gelber, Lidia Schapira, Steven Come, Virginia F Borges, Bryce Larsen, Judy E Garber, Ann H Partridge

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01468246 (Helping Ourselves, Helping Others), which is not on this map. Cited by 75 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01468246 active not recruitingnot on this map

Helping Ourselves, Helping Others: The Young Women's Breast Cancer Study

TypeobservationalSponsorDana-Farber Cancer InstituteRan2006 to 2035Enrolled1,302ConditionsBreast Cancer
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Frontiers in oncology · 2026
    Review
  8. Impact ofDiseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Clinical Behavior of Breast Cancer in YoungJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Fertility and Pregnancy-Related Issues in YoungBreast cancer : basic and clinical research · 2024
    Review

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Shoshana M RosenbergDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Kathryn J RuddyDeparment of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Rulla M TamimiChanning Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Shari GelberDepartment of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Lidia SchapiraDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
Steven ComeDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Virginia F BorgesDivision of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Denver.
Bryce LarsenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Judy E GarberDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Ann H PartridgeDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

Harvard Education Program in Cancer Prevention Control (R25T)R25CA057711 · NCI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (SCH OF PUBLIC HLTH) · PI DAVISON, KIRSTEN · 1992 to 2018
$8.5M
Reducing Social Disparities in Cancer Risk: The Role of Work and Worker HealthK05CA108663 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE · PI SORENSEN, GLORIAN C · 2004 to 2015
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS K05 CA108663NCI NIH HHS R25 CA057711
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceBRCA testing is recommended for young women diagnosed as having breast cancer, but little is known about decisions surrounding testing and how results may influence treatment decisions in young patients.

objectivesTo describe the use of BRCA testing and to evaluate how concerns about genetic risk and use of genetic information affect subsequent treatment decisions in young women with breast cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsCross-sectional analysis of data collected following the opening of the study to accrual from October 10, 2006, through December 31, 2014, as part of the Helping Ourselves, Helping Others: Young Women's Breast Cancer Study, an ongoing prospective cohort study. Study participants included 897 women aged 40 years and younger at breast cancer diagnosis from 11 academic and community medical centers. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Frequency and trends in the use of BRCA testing and how genetic information is used to make treatment decisions among women who test positive vs negative for a BRCA mutation.

resultsA total of 780 (87.0%) of 897 women reported BRCA testing by 1 year after breast cancer diagnosis (mean age at diagnosis, 35.3 vs 36.9 years for untested women; P < .001), with the frequency of testing increasing among women diagnosed from August 1, 2006, through December 31, 2013. Of 39 women who were diagnosed as having breast cancer in 2006, 30 (76.9%) reported testing. In 2007, a slightly lower percentage of women (87 of 124 [70.2%]) reported testing; however, the proportion tested increased each subsequent year, with 141 (96.6%) of 146 and 123 (95.3%) of 129 women diagnosed as having breast cancer in 2012 and 2013, respectively, reporting BRCA testing (P < .001). Among untested women, 37 (31.6%) of 117 did not report discussion of the possibility that they might have a mutation with a physician and/or genetic counselor, and 43 (36.8%) of 117 were thinking of testing in the future. A total of 248 (29.8%) of 831 women said that knowledge or concern about genetic risk influenced treatment decisions; among these women, 76 (86.4%) of 88 mutation carriers and 82 (51.2%) of 160 noncarriers chose bilateral mastectomy (P < .001). Fewer women reported that systemic treatment decisions were influenced by genetic risk concern. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Rates of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation testing are increasing in young women with breast cancer. Given that knowledge and concern about genetic risk influence surgical decisions and may affect systemic therapy trial eligibility, all young women with breast cancer should be counseled and offered genetic testing, consistent with the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines.

Indexed as

Genetic TestingAdultBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinBreast NeoplasmsFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMutationRisk FactorsYoung AdultBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanBRCA2 Protein

Identifiers

PMID26867710
PMCPMC5002892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.