ArticleJAMA oncology2016
BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Testing in Young Women With Breast Cancer.
Article in JAMA oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01468246 (Helping Ourselves, Helping Others), which is not on this map. Cited by 75 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Helping Ourselves, Helping Others: The Young Women's Breast Cancer Study
Who cites it
75 citing papers in PubMed.
- All HER2-negative breast cancer patients need gBRCA testing: cost-effectiveness and clinical benefits.British journal of cancer · 2023Trial
- Surgical Management of Early-Onset Breast Cancer Among Young BRCA1 and BRCA2 Carriers.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Real-world uptake of gBRCA testing as a companion diagnostic for olaparib in patients with high-risk HER2-negative early breast cancer in Japan: a cross-sectional multicenter study (BRCAwareness).Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) · 2026Article
- Tailoring targeted therapies for younger women with ER-positive early-stage breast cancer.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026Review
- Article
- Clinical Characteristics and Long-Term Outcomes of Young Women With Breast Cancer: A Multicenter Study From Uruguay.Cureus · 2026Article
- Review
- Impact ofDiseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Trends in the Incidence of Ovarian Cancer Among Premenopausal and Postmenopausal Women in the United States, 2001 to 2021.Cancers · 2025Article
- Genetic counseling referral rates and genetic testing outcomes in women with young breast cancer: a 20-year Canadian review.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2025Article
- Clinical Behavior of Breast Cancer in YoungJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2025Article
- Precision Medicine in High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer: Targeted Therapies and the Challenge of Chemoresistance.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Attitude towards genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility genes and choice of prevention strategies in Chinese women with or without breast cancer.Cancer biology & medicine · 2025Article
- Global trends and health workforce analysis of breast cancer burden from high red meat consumption 1990-2050 using machine learning approach.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
- Women's preferences for genetic screening in routine care: A qualitative study.Patient education and counseling · 2025Article
- Fertility in early breast cancer patients: integrating reproductive planning into oncology care.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Review
- Genetic counseling and genetic testing for pathogenic germline mutations among high-risk patients previously diagnosed with breast cancer: a traceback approach.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Subtype-Specific Survival of Young Women with Breast Cancer and Its Interaction with the Germline BRCA Status.Cancers · 2024Article
- Adverse drug events associated with capecitabine: a real-world pharmacovigilance study based on the FAERS database.Therapeutic advances in drug safety · 2024Article
- Fertility and Pregnancy-Related Issues in YoungBreast cancer : basic and clinical research · 2024Review
15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
importanceBRCA testing is recommended for young women diagnosed as having breast cancer, but little is known about decisions surrounding testing and how results may influence treatment decisions in young patients.
objectivesTo describe the use of BRCA testing and to evaluate how concerns about genetic risk and use of genetic information affect subsequent treatment decisions in young women with breast cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND
participantsCross-sectional analysis of data collected following the opening of the study to accrual from October 10, 2006, through December 31, 2014, as part of the Helping Ourselves, Helping Others: Young Women's Breast Cancer Study, an ongoing prospective cohort study. Study participants included 897 women aged 40 years and younger at breast cancer diagnosis from 11 academic and community medical centers. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Frequency and trends in the use of BRCA testing and how genetic information is used to make treatment decisions among women who test positive vs negative for a BRCA mutation.
resultsA total of 780 (87.0%) of 897 women reported BRCA testing by 1 year after breast cancer diagnosis (mean age at diagnosis, 35.3 vs 36.9 years for untested women; P < .001), with the frequency of testing increasing among women diagnosed from August 1, 2006, through December 31, 2013. Of 39 women who were diagnosed as having breast cancer in 2006, 30 (76.9%) reported testing. In 2007, a slightly lower percentage of women (87 of 124 [70.2%]) reported testing; however, the proportion tested increased each subsequent year, with 141 (96.6%) of 146 and 123 (95.3%) of 129 women diagnosed as having breast cancer in 2012 and 2013, respectively, reporting BRCA testing (P < .001). Among untested women, 37 (31.6%) of 117 did not report discussion of the possibility that they might have a mutation with a physician and/or genetic counselor, and 43 (36.8%) of 117 were thinking of testing in the future. A total of 248 (29.8%) of 831 women said that knowledge or concern about genetic risk influenced treatment decisions; among these women, 76 (86.4%) of 88 mutation carriers and 82 (51.2%) of 160 noncarriers chose bilateral mastectomy (P < .001). Fewer women reported that systemic treatment decisions were influenced by genetic risk concern. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Rates of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation testing are increasing in young women with breast cancer. Given that knowledge and concern about genetic risk influence surgical decisions and may affect systemic therapy trial eligibility, all young women with breast cancer should be counseled and offered genetic testing, consistent with the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.