Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26867542›Full record

Trial reportBMC pulmonary medicine2016

Home Non Invasive Ventilation (NIV) treatment for COPD patients with a history of NIV-treated exacerbation; a randomized, controlled, multi-center study.

Kasper Linde Ankjærgaard, Philip Tønnesen, Lars Christian Laursen, Ejvind Frausing Hansen, Helle Frost Andreassen, Jon Torgny Wilcke

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01513655 (Home Non Invasive Ventilation), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01513655 phase4unknown statusnot on this map

Home Non Invasive Ventilation (NIV) Treatment for COPD-patients After a NIV-treated Exacerbation

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, Gentofte, CopenhagenRan2013 to 2020Enrolled150ConditionsChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Airways Disease, Chronic Hypercapnic Respiratory FailureArmsLTNIV
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Chronic non-invasive ventilation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Supplemental oxygen and noninvasive ventilation.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Kasper Linde AnkjærgaardDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Gentofte Hospital, Kildegårdsvej 28, 2900, Hellerup, Denmark. ankjaergaard@live.dk.
Philip TønnesenRigshospitalet Glostrup, The Danish Center of Sleep Medicine, Glostrup Nordre Ringvej 57, 2600, Glostup, Denmark. philipt@dadlnet.dk.
Lars Christian LaursenDepartment of Medicine, Herlev Hospital, Herlev Ringvej 75, 2730, Herlev, Denmark. lars.christian.laursen@regionh.dk.
Ejvind Frausing HansenDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine and Cardiology, Hvidovre Hospital, Kettegård Allé 30, 2650, Hvidovre, Denmark. Ejvind.Frausing.Hansen@regionh.dk.
Helle Frost AndreassenDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Bispebjerg Hospital, Bispebjerg Bakke 23, 2400, København, NV, Denmark. Helle.Andreassen@regionh.dk.
Jon Torgny WilckeDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Gentofte Hospital, Kildegårdsvej 28, 2900, Hellerup, Denmark. t.wilcke@dadlnet.dk.
Gentofte Hospital · DKBispebjerg Hospital · DKGlostrup Hospital · DKHerlev Hospital · DKHvidovre Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, the prognosis for patients who have survived an episode of acute hypercapnic respiratory failure due to an exacerbation is poor. Despite being shown to improve survival and quality-of-life in stable patients with chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure, long-term noninvasive ventilation is controversial in unstable patients with frequent exacerbations, complicated by acute hypercapnic respiratory failure. In an uncontrolled group of patients with previous episodes of acute hypercapnic respiratory failure, treated with noninvasive ventilation, we have been able to reduce mortality and the number of repeat respiratory failure and readmissions by continuing the acute noninvasive ventilatory therapy as a long-term therapy.

methodsMulti-center open label randomized controlled trial of 150 patients having survived an admission with noninvasive ventilatory treatment of acute hypercapnic respiratory failure due chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The included patients are randomized to usual care or to continuing the acute noninvasive ventilation as a long-term therapy, both with a one-year follow-up period. The primary endpoint is time to death or repeat acute hypercapnic respiratory failure; secondary endpoints are one-year mortality, number of readmissions and repeat acute hypercapnic respiratory failure, exacerbations, dyspnea, quality of life, sleep quality, lung function, and arterial gases. DISCUSSION: Though previous studies of long-term noninvasive ventilation have shown conflicting results, we believe the treatment can reduce mortality and readmissions when applied in patients with previous need of acute ventilatory support, regardless of persistent hypercapnia.

trial registrationclinicaltrials.org: NCT01513655 16-Jan-2012.

Indexed as

Home Care ServicesCohort StudiesHospitalizationHumansHypercapniaNoninvasive VentilationPatient ReadmissionPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveRespiratory InsufficiencyRetrospective StudiesSurvival Rate

Identifiers

PMID26867542
PMCPMC4751632
OpenAlexW2255374931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.