Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26867502›Full record

ArticleEvolution; international journal of organic evolution2016

Nematode-bacteria mutualism: Selection within the mutualism supersedes selection outside of the mutualism.

Levi T Morran, McKenna J Penley, Victoria S Byrd, Andrew J Meyer, Timothy S O'Sullivan, Farrah Bashey, Heidi Goodrich-Blair, Curtis M Lively

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolution; international journal of organic evolution, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Levi T MorranDepartment of Biology, Indiana University, 1001 E. Third St., Bloomington, Indiana, 47405. levi.morran@emory.edu.
McKenna J PenleyDepartment of Biology, Indiana University, 1001 E. Third St., Bloomington, Indiana, 47405.
Victoria S ByrdDepartment of Biology, Indiana University, 1001 E. Third St., Bloomington, Indiana, 47405.
Andrew J MeyerDepartment of Biology, Indiana University, 1001 E. Third St., Bloomington, Indiana, 47405.
Timothy S O'SullivanDepartment of Biology, Indiana University, 1001 E. Third St., Bloomington, Indiana, 47405.
Farrah BasheyDepartment of Biology, Indiana University, 1001 E. Third St., Bloomington, Indiana, 47405.
Heidi Goodrich-BlairDepartment of Bacteriology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1550 Linden Dr. Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, 53706.
Curtis M LivelyDepartment of Biology, Indiana University, 1001 E. Third St., Bloomington, Indiana, 47405.

Funding

Empirical Tests and Genomic Analysis of the Constraints Imposed by Coevolution WiF32GM096482 · NIGMS · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI MORRAN, LEVI T · 2011 to 2013
$151k
NIGMS NIH HHS 1F32GM096482-01NIGMS NIH HHS F32 GM096482
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The coevolution of interacting species can lead to codependent mutualists. Little is known about the effect of selection on partners within verses apart from the association. Here, we determined the effect of selection on bacteria (Xenorhabdus nematophila) both within and apart from its mutualistic partner (a nematode, Steinernema carpocapsae). In nature, the two species cooperatively infect and kill arthropods. We passaged the bacteria either together with (M+), or isolated from (M-), nematodes under two different selection regimes: random selection (S-) and selection for increased virulence against arthropod hosts (S+). We found that the isolated bacteria evolved greater virulence under selection for greater virulence (M-S+) than under random selection (M-S-). In addition, the response to selection in the isolated bacteria (M-S+) caused a breakdown of the mutualism following reintroduction to the nematode. Finally, selection for greater virulence did not alter the evolutionary trajectories of bacteria passaged within the mutualism (M+S+ = M+S-), indicating that selection for the maintenance of the mutualism was stronger than selection for increased virulence. The results show that selection on isolated mutualists can rapidly breakdown beneficial interactions between species, but that selection within a mutualism can supersede external selection, potentially generating codependence over time.

Indexed as

SymbiosisAnimalsBiological EvolutionRhabditidaXenorhabdusAdaptationcoevolutionexperimental selectionsymbiosis

Identifiers

PMID26867502
PMCPMC4801668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.