Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26867043›Full record

ArticleHealth psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association2016

Depressive symptoms and responses to cigarette pack warning labels among Mexican smokers.

Amira Osman, James F Thrasher, Ebru Cayir, James W Hardin, Rosaura Perez-Hernandez, Brett Froeliger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Amira OsmanDepartment of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina.
James F ThrasherDepartment of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina.
Ebru CayirDepartment of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina.
James W HardinDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina.
Rosaura Perez-HernandezNational Institute of Public Health, Department of Tobacco Research, Population Health Research Center.
Brett FroeligerDepartment of Neuroscience, Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina.

Funding

Variation in Cigarettes, Tobacco use Behaviors and Exposures in ITC CountriesP01CA138389 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI CUMMINGS, KENNETH MICHAEL · 2009 to 2013
$13.4M
Building evidence for effective and sustainable cigarette warning label policyR01CA167067 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI THRASHER, JAMES · 2012 to 2016
$2.7M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA138389NCI NIH HHS R01 CA167067
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe examine whether having depressive symptoms (DS) is associated with different responses to cigarette package health warning labels (HWLs) before and after the implementation of pictorial HWLs in Mexico.

methodWe analyze data from adult smokers from Wave 4 and Wave 5 (n = 1,340) of the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Project in Mexico. Seven Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) items assessed DS, with scores ≥7 indicating elevated DS. Outcomes included: attention to HWLs, cognitive responses to HWLs, tobacco constituents awareness, putting off smoking due to HWLs, avoidance of HWLs, and awareness of telephone support for cessation (i.e., quitlines). Mixed effects models were used to assess main and interactive effects of DS and time (i.e., survey wave) on each outcome.

resultsAll HWL responses increased over time, except putting off smoking. Statistically significant interactions were found between DS and time for models of tobacco constituents awareness (b = -0.36, SE = 0.15, p = .022), putting off smoking (OR = 0.41, 95% CI [0.25, 0.66]), avoidance of HWLs (OR = 1.84, 95% CI [1.03, 3.29]), and quitline awareness (OR = 0.35, 95% CI [0.21, 0.56]). Compared to smokers with low DS, smokers with elevated DS reported stronger HWL responses at baseline; however, HWL responses increased over time among smokers with low DS, whereas HWL responses showed little or no change among smokers with elevated DS. DISCUSSION: Population-level increases in HWL responses after pictorial HWLs were introduced in Mexico appeared mostly limited to smokers with low DS. In general, however, smokers with elevated DS reported equivalent or stronger HWL responses than smokers with low DS.

Indexed as

Product LabelingSmokingSmoking CessationTobacco ProductsAdolescentAdultAwarenessDepressionFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMexicoOdds RatioProgram Evaluation

Identifiers

PMID26867043
PMCPMC4833615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.