Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26867000›Full record

ArticleExperimental and clinical psychopharmacology2016

Individual differences in subjective alcohol responses and alcohol-related disinhibition.

Patrick D Quinn, Kim Fromme

Open access · hybridAbstract readControlled Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Relationships between generalized impulsivity and subjective stimulant and sedative responses following alcohol administration.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2019
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Patrick D QuinnDepartment of Psychology, The University of Texas at Austin.
Kim FrommeDepartment of Psychology, The University of Texas at Austin.
The University of Texas at Austin · US

Funding

Alcohol and Behavioral Risks Throughout CollegeR01AA013967 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AUSTIN · PI FROMME, KIM · 2003 to 2009
$3.3M
Genetic Mechanisms of Change in Trajectories of Drinking and Deviant BehaviorsR01AA020637 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI FROMME, KIM · 2012 to 2016
$2.3M
Alcohol Response, Cognitive Impairment, and Alcohol-Related Negative ConsequencesF31AA020725 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI QUINN, PATRICK DONOVAN · 2011 to 2013
$66k
NIAAA NIH HHS F31 AA020725NIAAA NIH HHS F31-AA020725NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA013967NIAAA NIH HHS R01-AA013967NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA020637
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are important individual differences in acute subjective responses to alcohol, which have often been assessed using self-report measures. There is also evidence of meaningful between-persons variation in alcohol's disinhibiting effects on behavior, such that some individuals become more impaired on tasks of inhibition than do others after an intoxicating dose. The degree to which subjective alcohol responses correspond with these disinhibition effects is not yet clear. In this study, we tested associations among indices of subjective alcohol responses and their correspondence with sensitivity to alcohol-related disinhibition. We recruited recent-binge-drinking emerging adults (N = 82) for a group-administered, placebo-controlled, within-subject, counterbalanced alcohol challenge in a simulated bar laboratory. Confirmatory factor analyses revealed that a 2-factor model with several cross-loadings explained associations among the subjective measures well, replicating a differentiation between stimulant-like and sedative-like subjective responses. Controlling sex and placebo performance, participants who reported greater subjective stimulant-like effects-but not sedative-like effects-experienced more alcohol-related disinhibition, as measured by cued go/no-go task inhibitory failures. This association was small-to-moderate in magnitude. The results of this study highlight the distinction between stimulant-like and sedative-like subjective alcohol effects. They suggest, additionally, that there may be modest commonalities between alcohol's acute impacts on subjective stimulation and objective disinhibition.

Indexed as

IndividualityInhibition, PsychologicalAdultAlcohol DrinkingEthanolFemaleHumansMalePsychomotor PerformanceYoung AdultEthanol

Identifiers

PMID26867000
PMCPMC4795977
OpenAlexW2316880868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.