Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26866919›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Intrapericardial Delivery of Cardiosphere-Derived Cells: An Immunological Study in a Clinically Relevant Large Animal Model.

Rebeca Blázquez, Francisco Miguel Sánchez-Margallo, Verónica Crisóstomo, Claudia Báez, Juan Maestre, Verónica Álvarez, Javier G Casado

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The Technique of Permanent Pericardial Catheter in Mice.JACC. Basic to translational science · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rebeca BlázquezStem Cell Therapy Unit, 'Jesús Usón' Minimally Invasive Surgery Centre, Cáceres, Spain.
Francisco Miguel Sánchez-MargalloStem Cell Therapy Unit, 'Jesús Usón' Minimally Invasive Surgery Centre, Cáceres, Spain.
Verónica CrisóstomoEndoluminal Therapy and Diagnosis, 'Jesús Usón' Minimally Invasive Surgery Centre, Cáceres, Spain.
Claudia BáezEndoluminal Therapy and Diagnosis, 'Jesús Usón' Minimally Invasive Surgery Centre, Cáceres, Spain.
Juan MaestreEndoluminal Therapy and Diagnosis, 'Jesús Usón' Minimally Invasive Surgery Centre, Cáceres, Spain.
Verónica ÁlvarezStem Cell Therapy Unit, 'Jesús Usón' Minimally Invasive Surgery Centre, Cáceres, Spain.
Javier G CasadoStem Cell Therapy Unit, 'Jesús Usón' Minimally Invasive Surgery Centre, Cáceres, Spain.
Centro de Cirugía de Mínima Invasión Jesús Usón · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe intrapericardial delivery has been defined as an efficient method for pharmacological agent delivery. Here we hypothesize that intrapericardial administration of cardiosphere-derived cells (CDCs) may have an immunomodulatory effect providing an optimal microenvironment for promoting cardiac repair. To our knowledge, this is the first report studying the effects of CDCs for myocardial repair using the intrapericardial delivery route. MATERIAL AND

methodsCDCs lines were isolated, expanded and characterized by flow cytometry and PCR. Their differentiation ability was determined using specific culture media and differential staining. 300,000 CDCs/kg were injected into the pericardial space of a swine myocardial infarcted model. Magnetic resonance imaging, biochemical analysis of pericardial fluid and plasma, cytokine measurements and flow cytometry analysis were performed.

resultsOur results showed that, phenotype and differentiation behavior of porcine CDCs were equivalent to previously described CDCs. Moreover, the intrapericardial administration of CDCs fulfilled the safety aspects as non-adverse effects were reported. Finally, the phenotypes of resident lymphocytes and TH1 cytokines in the pericardial fluid were significantly altered after CDCs administration.

conclusionsThe pericardial fluid could be considered as a safe and optimal vehicle for CDCs administration. The observed changes in the studied immunological parameters could exert a modulation in the inflammatory environment of infarcted hearts, indirectly benefiting the endogenous cardiac repair.

Indexed as

AdipocytesAnimalsCell DifferentiationCell TransplantationChondrocytesCytokinesDisease Models, AnimalFlow CytometryMagnetic Resonance ImagingMyocardial InfarctionMyocardiumMyocytes, CardiacOsteogenesisPericardiumPhenotypePolymerase Chain ReactionCytokines

Identifiers

PMID26866919
PMCPMC4750976
OpenAlexW2259970583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.