Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26866681›Full record

ReviewThe British journal of radiology2016

Chest pain: coronary CT in the ER.

Erica Maffei, Sara Seitun, Andrea I Guaricci, Filippo Cademartiri

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The British journal of radiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Cardiac CT perfusion and FFRCardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2020
    Review
  3. Prognostic value of cardiac CT.La Radiologia medica · 2020
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Erica Maffei1 Centre de Recherché/Department of Radiology, Montréal Heart Institute/Universitè de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
Sara Seitun2 Department of Radiology, IRCCS San Martino University Hospital-IST, Genoa, Italy.
Andrea I Guaricci3 Department of Cardiology, Academic Hospital, Bari, Italy.
Filippo Cademartiri1 Centre de Recherché/Department of Radiology, Montréal Heart Institute/Universitè de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0579-3279

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiac CT has developed into a robust clinical tool during the past 15 years. Of the fields in which the potential of cardiac CT has raised more interest is chest pain in acute settings. In fact, the possibility to exclude with high reliability obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients at low-to-intermediate risk is of great interest both from the clinical standpoint and from the management standpoint. Several other modalities, with or without imaging, have been used during the past decades in the settings of new onset chest pain or in acute chest pain for both diagnostic and prognostic assessment of CAD. Each one has advantages and disadvantages. Most imaging modalities also focus on inducible ischaemia to guide referral to invasive coronary angiography. The advent of cardiac CT has introduced a new practice diagnostic paradigm, being the most accurate non-invasive method for identification and exclusion of CAD. Furthermore, the detection of subclinical CAD and plaque imaging offer the opportunity to improve risk stratification. Moreover, recent advances of the latest generation CT scanners allow combining both anatomical and functional imaging by stress myocardial perfusion. The role of cardiac CT in acute settings is already important and will become progressively more important in the coming years.

Indexed as

Coronary AngiographyEmergency Service, HospitalTomography, X-Ray ComputedChest PainCoronary Artery DiseaseHumansReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID26866681
PMCPMC4985473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.