Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26866578›Full record

ArticleGenetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics2016

Patients with colorectal cancer associated with Lynch syndrome and MLH1 promoter hypermethylation have similar prognoses.

Sigurdis Haraldsdottir, Heather Hampel, Christina Wu, Daniel Y Weng, Peter G Shields, Wendy L Frankel, Xueliang Pan, Albert de la Chapelle, Richard M Goldberg, Tanios Bekaii-Saab

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Diagnostics of Mutations in MMR/Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. DNA Mismatch Repair Gene Variants in Sporadic Solid Cancers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sigurdis HaraldsdottirDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Heather HampelDivision of Human Genetics, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, Columbus, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7558-9794
Christina WuDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Daniel Y WengComprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Peter G ShieldsDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Wendy L FrankelDepartment of Pathology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Xueliang PanCenter for Biostatistics, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Albert de la ChapelleDivision of Human Genetics, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Richard M GoldbergDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, Columbus, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3713-6895
Tanios Bekaii-SaabDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, Columbus, Ohio, USA.

Funding

Translational Therapeutics Research Program (TT)P30CA016058 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Tasleem J Padamsee · 1985 to 2026
$132.3M
Translational Training Grant in Experimental TherapeuticsK12CA133250 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI WILLIAM E. CARSON, Rosa Lapalombella · 2008 to 2026
$15.0M
INCIDENCE AND MOLECULAR SCREENING FOR HEREDITARY CANCERR01CA067941 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI DE LA CHAPELLE, ALBERT · 2000 to 2004
$2.9M
NATURAL HISTORY AND INCIDENCE OF HEREDITARY COLON CANCERU01CA067941 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI · PI DE LA CHAPELLE, ALBERT · 1996 to 1999
–
NCI NIH HHS K12 CA133250NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016058NCI NIH HHS R01 CA067941NCI NIH HHS U01 CA067941
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) colorectal cancer (CRC) is caused by Lynch syndrome (LS) in 3% and sporadic inactivation of MLH1 by hypermethylation (MLH1-hm) in 12% of cases. It is not clear whether outcomes between LS-associated and MLH1-hm CRC differ. The objective of this study was to explore differences in clinical factors and outcomes in these two groups.

methodsPatients with dMMR CRC identified by immunohistochemistry staining and treated at a single institution from 1998 to 2012 were included. MLH1-hm was established with BRAF mutational analysis or hypermethylation testing. Patients' charts were accessed for information on pathology, germ-line MMR mutation testing, and clinical course.

resultsA total of 143 patients had CRC associated with LS (37 patients, 26%) or MLH1-hm (106 patients, 74%). Patients with LS were younger, more often male, presented more often with stage III disease, and had more metachronous disease than patients with MLH1-hm tumors. There was no difference in cancer-specific survival (CSS) between the groups; overall survival was longer in patients with LS, but this difference was minimal after adjusting for age and stage at diagnosis.

conclusionCSS did not differ in LS-associated CRC compared with MLH1-hm CRC, suggesting that they carry a similar prognosis.Genet Med 18 9, 863-868.

Indexed as

AdultAgedColorectal NeoplasmsColorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary NonpolyposisDisease-Free SurvivalDNA MethylationDNA Mismatch RepairFemaleGerm-Line MutationHumansMaleMiddle AgedMutL Protein Homolog 1PrognosisPromoter Regions, GeneticProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafBRAF protein, humanMLH1 protein, humanMutL Protein Homolog 1Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf

Identifiers

PMID26866578
PMCPMC5489337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.