Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26866392›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational gastroenterology2016

The Effects of Bowel Preparation on Microbiota-Related Metrics Differ in Health and in Inflammatory Bowel Disease and for the Mucosal and Luminal Microbiota Compartments.

Rima M Shobar, Suresh Velineni, Ali Keshavarzian, Garth Swanson, Mark T DeMeo, Joshua E Melson, John Losurdo, Philip A Engen, Yan Sun, Lars Koenig and 1 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational gastroenterology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 64 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05485103 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

A Prospective Study of the Effect of Modified Colonoscopy Bowel Preparation Program on Intestinal Cleaning, Examination and Disease in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease

TypeinterventionalSponsorPeking Union Medical College HospitalRan2022 to 2024Enrolled144ConditionsInflammatory Bowel DiseasesArmsPolyethylene Glycols
NCT06172647 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Intestinal Microbiome Adherent to the Mucosa in Microscopic Colitis in Comparison With Patients With Advanced Colon Adenomas

TypeobservationalSponsorHospital Mutua de TerrassaRan2022 to 2025Enrolled60ConditionsMicroscopic Colitis, Colorectal Cancer, Colon AdenomaArmsColonoscopy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 105 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Microbiome Composition in Microscopic Colitis: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Probiotics Accelerate Microbiota and Metabolic Pathway Recovery Following Colonoscopy Bowel Preparation in Ulcerative Colitis.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026
    Trial
  5. Prospective and Cross-sectional Associations of the Rectal Tissue Microbiome with Colorectal Adenoma Recurrence.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2023
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rima M ShobarRush University Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, Section of Gastroenterology, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Suresh VelineniRush University Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, Section of Gastroenterology, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Ali KeshavarzianRush University Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, Section of Gastroenterology, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Garth SwansonRush University Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, Section of Gastroenterology, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Mark T DeMeoRush University Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, Section of Gastroenterology, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Joshua E MelsonRush University Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, Section of Gastroenterology, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
John LosurdoRush University Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, Section of Gastroenterology, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Philip A EngenRush University Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, Section of Gastroenterology, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Yan SunResearch and Testing Laboratory, LLC, Lubbock, Texas, USA.
Lars KoenigResearch and Testing Laboratory, LLC, Lubbock, Texas, USA.
Ece A MutluRush University Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, Section of Gastroenterology, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Rush University Medical Center · USArkansas Agricultural Experiment Station · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesBowel preparations (BPs) taken before colonoscopy may introduce a confounding effect on the results of gastrointestinal microbiota studies. This study aimed to determine the effect of bowel preparation on the mucosa-associated and luminal colonic microbiota in healthy subjects (HC) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients.

methodsBiopsy samples (n=36) and fecal samples (n=30) were collected from 10 HC and 8 IBD subjects pre- and post-BP. 16S rRNA gene was pyrosequenced using 454 Titanium protocols. We compared the differences between the pre- and post-BP samples (i.e., comparisons-across-bowel-prep); we examined the effect of BP on the expected separation of the mucosal vs. the luminal compartments (i.e., comparisons-across-compartments). Last, we compared the baseline differences between the HC vs. IBD groups (a secondary analysis), and examined whether the differences between the HC vs. IBD changed after BP.

resultsIn comparisons-across-bowel-prep, the Shannon's index (SI) decreased only in the biopsy samples of IBD subjects post-BP (P=0.025) and phylogenetic diversity-whole tree (PD-WT) metric decreased in biopsy samples of HC subjects post-BP (P=0.021). In secondary comparisons, the subtle differences between the fecal samples of the HC vs. IBD groups, in terms of evenness and the SI, were not apparent post-BP. In terms of β-diversity, in comparisons-across-bowel-prep, the proportion of shared operational taxonomic units (OTUs) in pre- and post-BP samples was low (~30%) and unweighted Unifrac distances between pre- and post-BP specimens ranged from 0.52 to 0.66. HC biopsies were affected more than IBD biopsies with BP (P=0.004). In comparisons-across-compartments, the proportion of shared OTUs between biopsy and fecal samples increased and Unifrac distances decreased post-BP in IBD subjects, reducing the differences between the mucosal and luminal compartments of the gut microbiota. Interindividual differences in Unifrac distances were preserved even with BP effects, although the effects were greater on weighted Unifrac distances. Bacteroidetes and its subtypes increased post-BP in both the luminal and mucosal compartments.

conclusionsBowel preparations affect the composition and diversity of the fecal and luminal microbiota in the short term, introducing potential bias into experiments examining the gut microbiota. The magnitude of the effect of BP is not greater than that of interindividual variation. Both the luminal and mucosal compartments of the gut microbiota get affected, and samples from controls and IBD subjects may get affected differently. Studies of the colonic microbiota should take into account the direction and the magnitude of the change introduced by BP during the design stage of the experiments, and consider sample sizes so that potential bias is minimized.

Identifiers

PMID26866392
PMCPMC4817412
OpenAlexW2419578639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.