ArticleClinical and translational gastroenterology2016
The Effects of Bowel Preparation on Microbiota-Related Metrics Differ in Health and in Inflammatory Bowel Disease and for the Mucosal and Luminal Microbiota Compartments.
Article in Clinical and translational gastroenterology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 64 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Prospective Study of the Effect of Modified Colonoscopy Bowel Preparation Program on Intestinal Cleaning, Examination and Disease in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Intestinal Microbiome Adherent to the Mucosa in Microscopic Colitis in Comparison With Patients With Advanced Colon Adenomas
Who cites it
64 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 105 citations in OpenAlex.
- Checkpoint inhibitor responses can be regulated by the gut microbiota - A systematic review.Neoplasia (New York, N.Y.) · 2023Pooled it
- Microbiome Composition in Microscopic Colitis: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Pooled it
- Effects of the Exclusive Enteral Nutrition on the Microbiota Profile of Patients with Crohn's Disease: A Systematic Review.Nutrients · 2017Pooled it
- Probiotics Accelerate Microbiota and Metabolic Pathway Recovery Following Colonoscopy Bowel Preparation in Ulcerative Colitis.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026Trial
- Prospective and Cross-sectional Associations of the Rectal Tissue Microbiome with Colorectal Adenoma Recurrence.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2023Trial
- Trial
- Spatial mapping of human colonic niches reveals rapid, mucus-specific microbiota disruption after bowel cleansing.Gut microbes · 2026Article
- From gut dysbiosis to eubiosis: understanding microbiome recovery as an ecological process.Gut microbes · 2026Review
- The Human Gut Microbiome Activity Is Resilient and Stable for up to Six Months: A Large Stool Metatranscriptomic Study.Microorganisms · 2026Article
- In mouse and in vitro models, bowel preparation promotes pathogen colonization, translocation, and exacerbation of inflammation.Cell reports. Medicine · 2026Article
- Comparison of microbiota profiles of fecal samples, rectal swabs and mucosal biopsies in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.Gut microbes reports · 2026Article
- The intestinal mucosa-associated microbiota in IBD-associated arthritis displays lower relative abundance ofGut microbes · 2025Article
- Impact of gut microbiome on outcomes following endoscopic interventions in gastrointestinal disease.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025Article
- The Fecal Microbiome of IBD Patients Is Less Divertible by Bowel Preparation Compared to Healthy Controls: Results From a Prospective Study.Inflammatory bowel diseases · 2025Article
- Gut-Heart Axis: The Role of Gut Microbiota and Metabolites in Heart Failure.Circulation research · 2025Review
- Bowel preparation before colonoscopy: Consequences, mechanisms, and treatment of intestinal dysbiosis.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Review
- Comparison of metagenomic analysis of fecal and gastrointestinal tract samples for identifying beneficial gut microorganisms.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Differences in gut microbiota among patients with anastomotic leak following colorectal cancer surgery.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Sampling strategies for digestive system flora studies: current research and perspectives.PeerJ · 2025Review
- Exploring the human small intestinal luminal microbiome via a newly developed ingestible sampling device.ISME communications · 2025Article
4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesBowel preparations (BPs) taken before colonoscopy may introduce a confounding effect on the results of gastrointestinal microbiota studies. This study aimed to determine the effect of bowel preparation on the mucosa-associated and luminal colonic microbiota in healthy subjects (HC) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients.
methodsBiopsy samples (n=36) and fecal samples (n=30) were collected from 10 HC and 8 IBD subjects pre- and post-BP. 16S rRNA gene was pyrosequenced using 454 Titanium protocols. We compared the differences between the pre- and post-BP samples (i.e., comparisons-across-bowel-prep); we examined the effect of BP on the expected separation of the mucosal vs. the luminal compartments (i.e., comparisons-across-compartments). Last, we compared the baseline differences between the HC vs. IBD groups (a secondary analysis), and examined whether the differences between the HC vs. IBD changed after BP.
resultsIn comparisons-across-bowel-prep, the Shannon's index (SI) decreased only in the biopsy samples of IBD subjects post-BP (P=0.025) and phylogenetic diversity-whole tree (PD-WT) metric decreased in biopsy samples of HC subjects post-BP (P=0.021). In secondary comparisons, the subtle differences between the fecal samples of the HC vs. IBD groups, in terms of evenness and the SI, were not apparent post-BP. In terms of β-diversity, in comparisons-across-bowel-prep, the proportion of shared operational taxonomic units (OTUs) in pre- and post-BP samples was low (~30%) and unweighted Unifrac distances between pre- and post-BP specimens ranged from 0.52 to 0.66. HC biopsies were affected more than IBD biopsies with BP (P=0.004). In comparisons-across-compartments, the proportion of shared OTUs between biopsy and fecal samples increased and Unifrac distances decreased post-BP in IBD subjects, reducing the differences between the mucosal and luminal compartments of the gut microbiota. Interindividual differences in Unifrac distances were preserved even with BP effects, although the effects were greater on weighted Unifrac distances. Bacteroidetes and its subtypes increased post-BP in both the luminal and mucosal compartments.
conclusionsBowel preparations affect the composition and diversity of the fecal and luminal microbiota in the short term, introducing potential bias into experiments examining the gut microbiota. The magnitude of the effect of BP is not greater than that of interindividual variation. Both the luminal and mucosal compartments of the gut microbiota get affected, and samples from controls and IBD subjects may get affected differently. Studies of the colonic microbiota should take into account the direction and the magnitude of the change introduced by BP during the design stage of the experiments, and consider sample sizes so that potential bias is minimized.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.