Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26865753›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical physics

Inter-departmental dosimetry audits - development of methods and lessons learned.

David J Eaton, Steve Bolton, Russell A S Thomas, Catharine H Clark

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical physics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. An on-site dosimetry audit for high-energy electron beams.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2018
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

David J EatonRadiotherapy Trials Quality Assurance Group, Mount Vernon Hospital, London, UK.
Steve BoltonInter-departmental Audit Group, Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine, York, UK; Department of Medical Physics and Engineering, Christie Hospital, Manchester, UK.
Russell A S ThomasRadiation Dosimetry Group, National Physical Laboratory, London, UK.
Catharine H ClarkRadiation Dosimetry Group, National Physical Laboratory, London, UK; Department of Medical Physics, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

External dosimetry audits give confidence in the safe and accurate delivery of radiotherapy. In the United Kingdom, such audits have been performed for almost 30 years. From the start, they included clinically relevant conditions, as well as reference machine output. Recently, national audits have tested new or complex techniques, but these methods are then used in regional audits by a peer-to-peer approach. This local approach builds up the radiotherapy community, facilitates communication, and brings synergy to medical physics.

Indexed as

Auditdosimetryradiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID26865753
PMCPMC4728888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.